Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41873956›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of breast health2026

Tomosynthesis-Guided Vacuum-Assisted Excision of B3 Breast Lesions: Reducing Overtreatment Without Compromising Safety.

Petra Valkovic Zujic, Nina Bartolovic, Jelena Rnjak, Lucija Vojta, Mateo Madunic, Manuela Avirovic, Ana Car Peterko

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of breast health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Petra Valkovic ZujicDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Clinical Hospital Centre Rijeka, Rijeka, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0003-4029-5432
Nina BartolovicDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Clinical Hospital Centre Rijeka, Rijeka, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0003-1402-8904
Jelena RnjakDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Clinical Hospital Centre Rijeka, Rijeka, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0003-2892-7249
Lucija VojtaDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Clinical Hospital Centre Rijeka, Rijeka, Croatia.
Mateo MadunicDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Clinical Hospital Centre Rijeka, Rijeka, Croatia.ORCID 0009-0004-5888-0351
Manuela AvirovicDepartment of General Pathology and Pathologic Anatomy, University of Rijeka Faculty of Medicine, Rijeka, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0002-6601-7521
Ana Car PeterkoDepartment of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Clinical Hospital Centre Rijeka, Rijeka, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0003-3148-0126

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Breast lesions of uncertain malignant potential (B3) pose a diagnostic and management challenge. Surgical excision (SE) has traditionally been the standard for definitive diagnosis, but it may represent overtreatment. Percutaneous vacuum-assisted excision (VAE) offers a minimally invasive alternative. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of VAE compared with SE for the management of B3 breast lesions, with the aim of reducing overtreatment. Materials and Methods: This retrospective single-center study included 64 patients with histologically confirmed B3 lesions diagnosed by tomosynthesis-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy between January 2018 and January 2024. Patients were managed by SE, VAE, or imaging follow-up, based on multidisciplinary team recommendations. Imaging characteristics, histopathology, upgrade rates, and follow-up outcomes were analyzed. Results: Most lesions presented as microcalcifications (92%). The most common histological subtypes were atypical intraductal epithelial proliferation (37.5%) and lobular neoplasia (25%). SE was performed in 26 patients (40%), VAE in 22 (34%), and 16 (25%) underwent follow-up. Malignant upgrades occurred in 8 of 26 SE-treated lesions (30.8%), predominantly atypical intraductal epithelial proliferation, while no upgrades were observed in the VAE group ( Conclusion: VAE is a safe, minimally invasive and effective alternative to SE for carefully selected B3 lesions, particularly those without atypia and with imaging-pathology concordance, potentially reducing overtreatment. Multidisciplinary evaluation remains essential.

Indexed as

Lesions of uncertain malignant potentialsecond-line breast biopsysurgeryvacuum-assisted biopsyvacuum-assisted excision

Identifiers

PMID41873956
PMCPMC13011153

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.