Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41873940›Full record

ArticleAcademic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine2026

Disposition at Equipoise: A Qualitative Study of Emergency Physicians' Decision-Making About Hospitalizing People With Dementia.

Anita N Chary, Annika R Bhananker, Rebecca Franks, Jason Bowman, Adrian D Haimovich, Victoria Martell, Elizabeth M Schoenfeld, Cameron J Gettel, Shan W Liu, Kei Ouchi and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Disposition at Equipoise: A Qualitative Study of Emergency Physicians' Decision-Making About Hospitalizing People With Dementia.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Anita N CharyDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
Annika R BhanankerCenter for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID 0009-0002-2800-8373
Rebecca FranksSchool of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
Jason BowmanDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
Adrian D HaimovichDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4106-7055
Victoria MartellDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Elizabeth M SchoenfeldDepartment of Emergency Medicine, UMass Chan-Baystate, Springfield, Massachusetts, USA.
Cameron J GettelDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6249-1023
Shan W LiuDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5602-3717
Kei OuchiDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2723-4259
Maura KennedyDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8755-7324
Aanand NaikDepartment of Management, Policy, and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Manish N ShahBerbeeWalsh Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.

Funding

Geriatrics Emergency care Applied Research Network 2.1 - AdvanCing and Expanding Dementia care (GEAR 2.1 - ACED)R33AG069822 · NIA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Ula Y Hwang, MANISH N SHAH · 2023 to 2026
$5.3M
Geriatric Emergency care Applied Research network 2.0 - Advancing Dementia Care (GEAR 2.0 ADC)R61AG069822 · NIA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI HWANG, ULA Y, SHAH, MANISH N · 2020 to 2021
$3.0M
Mentoring and Research in Patient-Oriented Geriatric Emergency CareK24AG054560 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI SHAH, MANISH N · 2017 to 2021
$955k
Identifying Implementation Strategies for Emergency Department (ED) Delirium Screening in Older AdultsR03AG078943 · NIA · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI CHARY, ANITA · 2022 to 2023
$320k
Emergency Medicine FoundationGeriatric Emergency care Applied Research Network 2.0-Advancing Dementia CareHouston Veterans Administration Health Services Research and Development Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness, and Safety CIN13-413NIA NIH HHS K24 AG054560NIA NIH HHS K24AG054560NIA NIH HHS R03 AG078943NIA NIH HHS R03AG078943NIA NIH HHS R33 AG069822NIA NIH HHS R33/R61AG069822NIA NIH HHS R61 AG069822West Health Institute
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeople with dementia are often hospitalized from the emergency department (ED) for conditions that could potentially be treated in the outpatient setting. In scenarios of clinical equipoise-where either admission or discharge may be appropriate-little is known about how emergency physicians make disposition decisions.

methodsWe conducted a qualitative study with attending emergency physicians at a single academic medical center. Interviews included open-ended questions about disposition decision-making in general as well as structured case scenarios using a think-aloud protocol. We used an inductive approach to code interview data and elucidate themes about the factors emergency physicians consider in disposition decisions for people with dementia in situations of clinical equipoise.

resultsWe interviewed twenty-one physicians with an average of 10.5 years of clinical practice (range 5-21 years). Five themes emerged: (1) assessing availability of, reliability of, and burden faced by caregivers; (2) anticipating clinical trajectory and feasibility of outpatient follow-up; (3) identifying acute cognitive changes that may reflect serious underlying illness; (4) navigating medicolegal concerns; and (5) weighing potential harms of hospitalization. Among these, caregiver assessments and clinical trajectories were discussed most frequently, with physicians describing informal and variable approaches to caregiving assessments. While many physicians recognized the risk of discharging a delirious patient, few acknowledged that hospitalization itself could contribute to delirium or other harms. Overall, emergency physicians' decisions were shaped not only by patient characteristics, but by the surrounding health system's capacity to support timely and safe outpatient care.

conclusionsED disposition decisions for people with dementia often depend on caregiving context and health system constraints. Improving alignment of admission decisions with patients' and care partners' values and preferences may require structured approaches to assessing caregiver capacity and communicating risks of hospitalization. Health system investment in outpatient infrastructure and alternatives to admission may better support emergency physicians in making safe, patient-centered decisions.

Indexed as

Clinical Decision-MakingDecision MakingDementiaHospitalizationPhysiciansAdultCaregiversEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedPatient DischargeQualitative Researchdementiadispositionemergency departmentgeriatricshospitalizationqualitativequalitative research

Identifiers

PMID41873940
PMCPMC13011787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.