ArticleAcademic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine2026
Disposition at Equipoise: A Qualitative Study of Emergency Physicians' Decision-Making About Hospitalizing People With Dementia.
Article in Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Disposition at Equipoise: A Qualitative Study of Emergency Physicians' Decision-Making About Hospitalizing People With Dementia.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPeople with dementia are often hospitalized from the emergency department (ED) for conditions that could potentially be treated in the outpatient setting. In scenarios of clinical equipoise-where either admission or discharge may be appropriate-little is known about how emergency physicians make disposition decisions.
methodsWe conducted a qualitative study with attending emergency physicians at a single academic medical center. Interviews included open-ended questions about disposition decision-making in general as well as structured case scenarios using a think-aloud protocol. We used an inductive approach to code interview data and elucidate themes about the factors emergency physicians consider in disposition decisions for people with dementia in situations of clinical equipoise.
resultsWe interviewed twenty-one physicians with an average of 10.5 years of clinical practice (range 5-21 years). Five themes emerged: (1) assessing availability of, reliability of, and burden faced by caregivers; (2) anticipating clinical trajectory and feasibility of outpatient follow-up; (3) identifying acute cognitive changes that may reflect serious underlying illness; (4) navigating medicolegal concerns; and (5) weighing potential harms of hospitalization. Among these, caregiver assessments and clinical trajectories were discussed most frequently, with physicians describing informal and variable approaches to caregiving assessments. While many physicians recognized the risk of discharging a delirious patient, few acknowledged that hospitalization itself could contribute to delirium or other harms. Overall, emergency physicians' decisions were shaped not only by patient characteristics, but by the surrounding health system's capacity to support timely and safe outpatient care.
conclusionsED disposition decisions for people with dementia often depend on caregiving context and health system constraints. Improving alignment of admission decisions with patients' and care partners' values and preferences may require structured approaches to assessing caregiver capacity and communicating risks of hospitalization. Health system investment in outpatient infrastructure and alternatives to admission may better support emergency physicians in making safe, patient-centered decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.