Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41873902›Full record

ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2026

ƒ(Cell): Software for Reproducible Analysis of Optoretinograms.

Robert F Cooper, Mina Gaffney, Brea D Brennan, Niko Rios

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Robert F CooperJoint Department of Biomedical Engineering, Marquette University and the Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Mina GaffneyJoint Department of Biomedical Engineering, Marquette University and the Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Brea D BrennanJoint Department of Biomedical Engineering, Marquette University and the Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Niko RiosJoint Department of Biomedical Engineering, Marquette University and the Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.

Funding

TRAINING IN VISION RESEARCHT32EY014536 · NEI · SMITH-KETTLEWELL EYE RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI NORCIA, ANTHONY M · 2002 to 2006
$1.0M
Non-Invasive Functional Assessments for Translational Retinal TherapeuticsR15EY033933 · NEI · MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY · PI COOPER, ROBERT F · 2023 to 2023
$479k
Characterizing retinal function using AOSLO based psychophysics and optoretinographyF31EY036692 · NEI · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI Mina M Gaffney · 2024 to 2026
$149k
NEI NIH HHS F31 EY036692NEI NIH HHS R15 EY033933NEI NIH HHS T32 EY014536
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: There has been a marked increase in use of a noninvasive functional imaging technique called optoretinography (ORG). As more groups use ORGs, it is crucial to have a consistent methodology, and understand what analysis parameters influence repeatability. In this work, we present an open-source software library called ƒ(Cell) designed to facilitate reproducible and repeatable analyses of ORG data. Methods: We designed ƒ(Cell) as a Python software library that can co-register and analyze ORG datasets, while also enabling process auditing. To validate the software, we used our previously obtained normative optoretinography datasets as well as datasets from six other groups. We performed a variance decomposition analysis of all ƒ(Cell) parameters. Results: Using ƒ(Cell), we successfully read and analyzed all seven datasets, despite varying data structures, file formats, and imaging protocols. Our full factorial analysis of 12,960 parameter permutations across 16 normative individuals resulted in 3 significant parameters (P < 0.001) with at least a small effect (ƞ2 > 0.01): segmentation radius, normalization, and relativization method, with ƞ2 = 0.213, 0.037, and 0.012, respectively. Conclusions: In a full factorial analysis of analysis parameters, we found that the mean subtraction relativization method, a segmentation radius matched to the spacing of the cells of interest, and score-based normalization resulted in the lowest coefficient of variance. Overall, we found that ƒ(Cell) enables consistent, reproducible, and auditable analyses of intensity-based ORG (iORG) datasets. Translational Relevance: This work is designed to facilitate reproducible analyses of ORG datasets to aid in the use of ORG in clinical trials.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedRetinaSoftwareHumansReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID41873902
PMCPMC13023225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.