ArticleActa chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Cechoslovaca2026
Dry Needle Arthroscopy of the Elbow with a 1.9 mm Chip-on-Tip System: a Cadaveric Study.
Article in Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Cechoslovaca, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Arthroscopy has evolved significantly with advancements in instrumentation and surgical techniques. The introduction of needle arthroscopy represents a promising minimally invasive alternative and, has for the wrist proven to offer a reduced soft tissue trauma with still maintained diagnostic and therapeutic efficacy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and visualization capabilities of needle arthroscopy of the elbow using cadaveric specimens. Six fresh-frozen cadaveric elbows (three right, three left) were examined using a needle arthroscope, followed by dissection to assess portal safety and proximity to neurovascular structures. The arthroscopic portals evaluated included the proximal anteromedial (PAMP), anteromedial (AMP), mid-anterolateral (MALP), postero-lateral (PLP), direct lateral, and direct posterior portals. The visualization quality of the needle arthroscope was found satisfactory and the smaller diameter (1.9 mm), allowed enhanced maneuverability. Needle arthroscopy offers improved access and acceptable visualization, potential risks remain, particularly concerning neurovascular structures. Notably, the anteromedial portal was in close proximity to the median nerve and medial antebrachial cutaneous nerve (MABCN), with one documented case of PBMACN (Posterior Branch of the MABCN) injury. Our results support the use of the needle arthroscope for elbow arthroscopy. However, caution is required to minimize neurovascular injury. Further studies are needed to establish standardized protocols and confirm the long-term safety and efficacy of needle arthroscopy in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41873869What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.