Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41873779›Full record

ArticleJournal of fish biology2026

Two-dimensional otolith size trends in myctophid fishes.

Víctor M Tuset, M Pilar Olivar, Amalia Manjabacas, Antoni Lombarte

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of fish biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Víctor M TusetInstituto de Oceanografía y Cambio Global, IOCAG, Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Unidad Asociada ULPGC-CSIC, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9032-2844
M Pilar OlivarDepartment Recursos Marins Renovables, Institut de Ciències del Mar (CSIC), Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8887-9181
Amalia ManjabacasDepartment Recursos Marins Renovables, Institut de Ciències del Mar (CSIC), Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8685-8697
Antoni LombarteDepartment Recursos Marins Renovables, Institut de Ciències del Mar (CSIC), Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5215-4587

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lanternfishes are a key food source for marine and terrestrial predators, and play an important role in energy transfer between surface waters and deeper layers. This study investigates otolith size variation in 105 myctophid species included in the AFORO database. The study covers the five Myctophidae subfamilies: Diaphinae, Gymnoscopelinae, Lampanyctinae, Myctophinae and Notolychninae. Several measurements were taken from the otoliths, and relative shape and sizes indices were calculated for the different fishes. Morphometric analyses revealed that Diaphinae and Gymnoscopelinae possess the largest otoliths in terms of length and width, whereas Notolychninae exhibited the smallest. Gymnoscopelinae were further characterized by more elliptic otolith shapes, while Diaphinae displayed proportionally larger otoliths relative to fish size. Non-linear regression between otolith length and fish length was performed for 59 species, providing complementary data for understanding prey-predator relationships. Also, loess regression between the otolith relative size and fish size showed different growth patterns among species, which could suggest dissimilar metabolic activity. Our study provides a tool that will improve future food webs and ecological studies on otolith size in other fish taxa.

Indexed as

FishesOtolithic MembraneAnimalsBody Sizefish–otolith relationshiplanternfishesmorphometrySagittae otolithsize indices

Identifiers

PMID41873779
PMCPMC13397304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.