ArticleJournal of fish biology2026
Two-dimensional otolith size trends in myctophid fishes.
Article in Journal of fish biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lanternfishes are a key food source for marine and terrestrial predators, and play an important role in energy transfer between surface waters and deeper layers. This study investigates otolith size variation in 105 myctophid species included in the AFORO database. The study covers the five Myctophidae subfamilies: Diaphinae, Gymnoscopelinae, Lampanyctinae, Myctophinae and Notolychninae. Several measurements were taken from the otoliths, and relative shape and sizes indices were calculated for the different fishes. Morphometric analyses revealed that Diaphinae and Gymnoscopelinae possess the largest otoliths in terms of length and width, whereas Notolychninae exhibited the smallest. Gymnoscopelinae were further characterized by more elliptic otolith shapes, while Diaphinae displayed proportionally larger otoliths relative to fish size. Non-linear regression between otolith length and fish length was performed for 59 species, providing complementary data for understanding prey-predator relationships. Also, loess regression between the otolith relative size and fish size showed different growth patterns among species, which could suggest dissimilar metabolic activity. Our study provides a tool that will improve future food webs and ecological studies on otolith size in other fish taxa.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.