Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41873669›Full record

ArticleChild development2026

Twins and their singleton siblings differ in language, cognition, and social-emotional development.

Emily Wood, Anna Brown, Sophie von Stumm

Abstract readTwin Study
In one paragraph

Article in Child development, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Emily WoodDepartment of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0009-0001-1610-3587
Anna BrownSchool of Psychology and Behavioural Sciences, University of Northampton, Northampton, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6119-7925
Sophie von StummDepartment of Education, University of York, York, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0447-5471

Funding

Jacobs FoundationNuffield Foundation FR-23238Paris Institute of Advanced StudyUK Medical Research Council MR/M021475/1UK Medical Research Council MR/V012878/1US National Institutes of Health AG046938
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study compared the language, cognition, and social-emotional development between twins and their younger singleton siblings at the ages 2, 3, 4, and 7 years. Data were collected 1996-2004 from 851 sibling trios from the Twins Early Development Study (TEDS; 50.2% female; 93.2% White British). Distributions were comparable between twins and singletons across domains, indicative of mean rather than variance discrepancies. Twins performed worse than singletons in language, cognition, and social-emotional development across ages, with small to moderate effect sizes (d = 0.17-0.62). An exception was language at age 7 years, when twins exceeded their singleton siblings (d = -0.35). Overall, twins and their singleton siblings differed in development across domains and their differences in language reversed during childhood.

Indexed as

Child DevelopmentCognitionEmotionsLanguage DevelopmentSiblingsSocial BehaviorTwinsChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMalecognitionindividual differenceslanguagesocial-emotionaltwins

Identifiers

PMID41873669
PMCPMC13176922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.