ReviewJournal of investigative medicine high impact case reports
Axillary Neuroendocrine Carcinoma: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.
Review in Journal of investigative medicine high impact case reports. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) represent neoplastic growths that arise from cells of neuroendocrine differentiation. They constitute a clinical spectrum from low-grade NETs with an indolent course to the aggressive undifferentiated high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma. We report a rare case of axillary neuroendocrine carcinoma of unknown primary site. The patient underwent axillary nodal excision followed by radiation therapy with good tolerability. However, distant cerebellar metastatic recurrence was evident 9 months later. We additionally review the literature on cases of axillary NETs. Their heterogenous behavior depict the need for strict clinical surveillance to allow for early identification of occult secondary metastasis and improve prognostic outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.