ArticleBone & joint open2026
How accurate are arthroplasty surgeons in visually estimating extension and flexion gaps in total knee arthroplasty?
Article in Bone & joint open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: The ability of a surgeon to provide accurate visual estimates of intraoperative gaps during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is not well understood. This study evaluated: 1) the accuracy of gap estimation in extension and in flexion; 2) the accuracy of gap estimation in the medial and lateral compartments, also in extension and flexion; 3) the differences in accuracy among surgeons; and 4) the frequency of clinically significant errors in gap estimation, defined as greater than 1 mm. Methods: A posterior stabilized TKA was performed on seven cadaveric knees. Five fellowship-trained arthroplasty surgeons and one orthopaedic resident manually stressed each knee, and visually assessed the medial and lateral gaps in full extension and 90° of flexion. Gaps were objectively measured via a motion capture system. Gap estimation error was calculated as the difference between the surgeons' visual assessment and the measured gaps. Results: Across all surgeons and knees, the mean gap estimation error was -0.4 mm (SD 0.7), with the majority (72%) of gaps being underestimated. Errors were greater in extension (-0.7 mm (SD 0.8)) than in flexion (-0.2 mm (SD 1.0)) (p < 0.001). Lateral gap error was less in flexion (-0.1 mm (SD 1.0)) than extension (-0.7 mm (SD 0.8)). Gap estimation error pooled for all assessments differed between surgeons, ranging from a mean error of -0.8 mm (SD 0.8) to 0.2 mm (SD 1.2) (p < 0.001). Clinically significant gap estimation errors (> 1 mm) occurred in 33% of assessments in extension and 26% in flexion (p = 0.315, not statistically different). The frequency of such errors varied by surgeon ranging from 18% to 42% (p = 0.370). Conclusion: Surgeons tend to underestimate intraoperative gaps during TKA, particularly in extension. Clinically meaningful gap estimation errors (> 1 mm) occurred in up to 33% (26/78) of exams, supporting the need to enhance gap assessment accuracy.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.