Trial reportStroke2026
Impact of Ultra-Early Perioperative Antihypertensive Therapy in Acute Intracerebral Hemorrhage.
Trial report in Stroke, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03209258 (An Investigator Initiated and Conducted, International, Multicenter, Stepped Wedge Cluster Randomized Study of a Care Bundle of Physiological Control Strategies in Acute Intracerebral Hemorrhage), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
An Investigator Initiated and Conducted, International, Multicenter, Stepped Wedge Cluster Randomized Study of a Care Bundle of Physiological Control Strategies in Acute Intracerebral Hemorrhage
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEarly intensive blood pressure (BP) lowering improves outcomes in acute intracerebral hemorrhage, but its perioperative benefit among patients undergoing surgical hematoma evacuation is uncertain. We evaluated whether earlier achievement of intensive BP targets is associated with improved outcomes in this population.
methodsPost hoc secondary analysis of the INTERACT3 (the third Intensive Care Bundle With Blood Pressure Reduction in Acute Cerebral Haemorrhage Trial) pragmatic, international, multicenter, blinded-end point, and stepped-wedge cluster-randomized trial. Among 7036 enrolled intracerebral hemorrhage patients at 121 hospitals, those who underwent surgical hematoma evacuation were included. Patients were categorized by time from hospital arrival to achieving the target systolic BP <140 mm Hg: ≤2 hours versus >2 hours. The primary outcome was 6-month mortality. Key secondary outcomes included death or disability (modified Rankin Scale scores 4-6), modified Rankin Scale score shift, health-related quality-of-life (EuroQol 5-Dimension 3-Level [EQ-5D-3L] domains, visual analog scale, and health utility index), and serious adverse events. Adjusted associations were estimated using Cox, logistic, ordinal logistic, and linear regression models, controlling for age, sex, treatment type, and admission Glasgow Coma Scale.
resultsOf 7036 patients with acute intracerebral hemorrhage, 1506 underwent surgical hematoma evacuation (mean [SD] age, 59.7 [11.8] years; 33.9% women). Overall, there was no statistically significant difference in 6-month mortality between patients who achieved target BP within 2 hours of treatment initiation and those who achieved it after 2 hours (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.81 [95% CI, 0.63-1.04];
conclusionsIn patients with intracerebral hemorrhage undergoing surgical hematoma evacuation, perioperative intensive BP reduction appears safe. Achieving systolic BP <140 mm Hg within 2 hours was associated with better functional and quality-of-life outcomes, and fewer serious adverse events. These time-sensitive associations support prioritizing ultra-early perioperative BP control; confirmatory prospective analyses are warranted. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03209258.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.