Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41873533›Full record

ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2026

Advancing Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping With 2.5D Diffusion Models for Rapid Intracranial Hemorrhage Quantification.

Zhuang Xiong, Yang Gao, Feng Liu, Derek Emery, Ken Butcher, Alan H Wilman, Hongfu Sun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Zhuang XiongImage X Institute, Sydney School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Yang GaoSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Central South University, Changsha, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3846-0999
Feng LiuSchool of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Derek EmeryDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Ken ButcherSchool of Clinical Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Alan H WilmanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Hongfu SunSchool of Engineering, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia.

Funding

Australian Research Council DE20101297Australian Research Council DP230101628National Health and Medical Research Council 2030157National Natural Science Foundation of China 62301616Natural Science Foundation of Hunan 2024JJ6530
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo develop a generative diffusion model-based approach for robust and efficient quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) reconstruction in intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), applicable to both standard gradient echo (GRE) and rapid echo planar imaging (EPI) acquisitions.

methodsQSMDiff, an unsupervised diffusion model for 3D QSM dipole inversion, was proposed. Three volumetric partitioning strategies including 2D slices, 3D patches, and 2.5D slabs were evaluated, and the memory-efficient 2.5D slab approach was adopted to balance accuracy and efficiency while maintaining anatomical fidelity. A conditional sampling mechanism ensured consistency with measured local fields, and a three-stage training data-generation strategy combining public dataset, synthetic QSM, and ICH lesions simulated from in vivo patients was implemented to overcome data scarcity.

resultsQSMDiff achieved the best overall performance in simulation studies, with SSIM of 0.97 ± 0.07, RMSE of 0.04 ± 0.03, and HFEN of 4.49 ± 0.83, demonstrating superior structural fidelity and noise suppression. For in vivo ICH patients scanned with rapid EPI, QSMDiff showed strong agreement with SWI-QSM references (R

conclusionQSMDiff achieves high-quality and accurate QSM reconstruction from both standard GRE and rapid EPI scans for ICH assessment. By integrating a 2.5D training strategy with synthetic ICH augmentation, it delivers accurate and reliable susceptibility maps even from lower-quality acquisitions, offering a practical solution for fast and robust ICH assessment.

Indexed as

Diffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingImage Processing, Computer-AssistedImaging, Three-DimensionalIntracranial HemorrhagesAlgorithmsBrainComputer SimulationEcho-Planar ImagingFemaleHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMaleReproducibility of Resultsdiffusion modelsecho planar imaging (EPI)intracranial hemorrhage (ICH)QSMDiffquantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM)

Identifiers

PMID41873533
PMCPMC13269196

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.