ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2026
Advancing Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping With 2.5D Diffusion Models for Rapid Intracranial Hemorrhage Quantification.
Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo develop a generative diffusion model-based approach for robust and efficient quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) reconstruction in intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), applicable to both standard gradient echo (GRE) and rapid echo planar imaging (EPI) acquisitions.
methodsQSMDiff, an unsupervised diffusion model for 3D QSM dipole inversion, was proposed. Three volumetric partitioning strategies including 2D slices, 3D patches, and 2.5D slabs were evaluated, and the memory-efficient 2.5D slab approach was adopted to balance accuracy and efficiency while maintaining anatomical fidelity. A conditional sampling mechanism ensured consistency with measured local fields, and a three-stage training data-generation strategy combining public dataset, synthetic QSM, and ICH lesions simulated from in vivo patients was implemented to overcome data scarcity.
resultsQSMDiff achieved the best overall performance in simulation studies, with SSIM of 0.97 ± 0.07, RMSE of 0.04 ± 0.03, and HFEN of 4.49 ± 0.83, demonstrating superior structural fidelity and noise suppression. For in vivo ICH patients scanned with rapid EPI, QSMDiff showed strong agreement with SWI-QSM references (R
conclusionQSMDiff achieves high-quality and accurate QSM reconstruction from both standard GRE and rapid EPI scans for ICH assessment. By integrating a 2.5D training strategy with synthetic ICH augmentation, it delivers accurate and reliable susceptibility maps even from lower-quality acquisitions, offering a practical solution for fast and robust ICH assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.