ArticleGenome biology and evolution2026
Identifying Adaptive Footprints in the Presence of Demographic Uncertainty.
Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Selection-guided discovery in South Asians implicates the MAPT locus in insulin resistance.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Identifying genomic regions shaped by natural selection is a central goal in evolutionary genomics. Existing machine learning methods for this task are typically trained on labeled data simulated according to specific evolutionary scenarios. While effective in controlled settings, these models are limited by their reliance on explicit class labels, detecting only the processes they were trained to recognize. This limitation makes it difficult to interpret predictions for regions shaped by other evolutionary forces, a problem especially acute when analyzing genomes influenced by mixtures of adaptive and demographic factors. One-vs-rest strategies offer a potential alternative but suffer from the complexity of modeling processes as a catch-all "rest" class. Here, we explore positive-unlabeled learning as a flexible framework for detecting adaptive events. This semi-supervised approach permits identification of a target class using only positive labels and an unlabeled background, without requiring explicit modeling of negatives. To assess its utility, we focus on a binary classification setting for detecting selective sweeps against a mixed background of unlabeled sweeps and neutrally evolving regions. We introduce PULSe, a method that trains only on labeled sweep observations while treating remaining data as unlabeled. By avoiding assumptions about background composition, PULSe enables robust sweep discovery in realistic genomic landscapes. We evaluate performance across demographic, adaptive, and confounding contexts, including domain shift from misspecified models, and find that PULSe delivers strong generalizability. Finally, analyzing European and Bengali genomes, we recapitulate known sweep candidates, demonstrating PULSe as a versatile tool for detecting adaptive regions across diverse genomic landscapes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.