ReviewRespirology (Carlton, Vic.)2026
OSA Endotyping as Targets for Treatment. How Far Have We Come?
Review in Respirology (Carlton, Vic.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Precision Pharmacotherapy for Obstructive Sleep Apnea: Matching Targeted Drugs to Patient Endophenotypes.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- The upper airway in obstructive sleep apnoea: state of the art.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2026Review
- OSA Endotyping as Targets for Treatment. How Far Have We Come?Respirology (Carlton, Vic.) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is highly prevalent and is associated with significant impairments in quality of life and comorbidity. The most common treatment employed is continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), especially in moderate and severe cases. The fundamental pathophysiology of the disorder relates to increased collapsibility of the oropharyngeal airway, but the growing recognition that multiple endotypic factors contribute to this collapsibility has opened the possibility of alternative treatment possibilities, especially in less severe cases. In addition to the most important endotype of upper airway narrowing, additional non-anatomical endotypes include upper airway muscle responsiveness, loop gain, and the arousal threshold. Recent reports have identified mechanisms to identify these endotypes, including those suitable for application in clinical practice. These developments have encouraged a focus on non-CPAP therapies, including oral appliances, pharmacotherapy, and neurostimulation. Recent reports have identified effective pharmacotherapies directed at each non-anatomical endotype. While CPAP is likely to remain the most important and widely used therapy for moderate and severe OSA in the foreseeable future, alternative therapies targeting specific endotypes, especially pharmacotherapy, are likely to play an increasing role in less severe cases in the medium term, and in patients who do not comply with CPAP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.