ReviewJournal of Korean medical science2026
Lessons From the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic: Implications for Antimicrobial Stewardship for COVID-19 Management.
Review in Journal of Korean medical science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- End-of-Life Antibiotic Use After the Life-Sustaining Treatment Decisions Act in Korea.JAMA network open · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has resulted in millions of deaths worldwide and has now become a major respiratory infectious disease. Beyond the direct effects of the viral infection, one of the most significant and concerning issues to emerge is the exacerbated threat of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) by the indirect impacts of COVID-19. Early in the pandemic, widespread empirical antibiotic prescribing occurred despite low bacterial co-infection rates. In addition, azithromycin, whose antiviral effect remains unproven, was frequently used. This high, often unnecessary consumption, coupled with disrupted antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) and infection prevention and control (IPC) programs, created conditions favoring the emergence and spread of AMR. In patients with severe COVID-19, multidrug-resistant organisms were frequently implicated in secondary infections, particularly in intensive care units (ICUs). Nevertheless, previous studies analyzing AMR metrics before and during the COVID-19 pandemic have shown inconsistent results. Strategies to mitigate the COVID-19 pandemic, such as enhanced surveillance, social distancing resulting in lower respiratory infections, and strengthened IPC and targeted AMS interventions, could play protective roles to inhibit the development of AMR. Additionally, targeted interventions-such as prospective audit and feedback, biomarker-guided antibiotic discontinuation, diagnostic stewardship using a rapid molecular test to distinguish viral from bacterial infections, embedding AMS decision support into electronic medical records, and tailoring interventions to high-risk settings such as ICUs-demonstrated the feasibility of reducing unnecessary antimicrobial use (AMU) even during crisis conditions. Also, vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 may indirectly reduce AMU and AMR by lowering the incidence of severe disease and secondary bacterial infections. Future COVID-19-specific AMS frameworks must integrate these experiences during the pandemic. This review synthesizes current evidence on the interplay between COVID-19, AMR, and AMU, and outlines stewardship strategies to reduce AMR in COVID-19 management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.