ArticleHuman reproduction open2026
Clinical and genetic basis of congenital gonadotropin deficiency.
Article in Human reproduction open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
study questionWhat is the clinical and genetic overlap across subtypes of congenital gonadotropin (Gn) deficiency? SUMMARY ANSWER: This study reveals substantial clinical and genetic overlap among Gn deficiency disorders, with shared genetic and developmental features across congenital hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (CHH), combined pituitary hormone deficiency (CPHD), and syndromic forms of Gn deficiency. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Congenital Gn deficiency includes a subset of hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (HH) and can result from defects at the level of the hypothalamus or the pituitary. It includes (i) CHH, further classified into normosmic CHH (nCHH) and Kallmann syndrome (KS); (ii) CPHD; and (iii) syndromic forms such as CHARGE syndrome and septo-optic dysplasia (SOD). STUDY DESIGN SIZE DURATION: The study included all probands with Gn deficiency recruited at a tertiary care center between 2011 and 2024 (n = 568), including 276 KS, 247 nCHH, 29 CPHD, and 16 syndromic Gn deficiency cases. All individuals underwent detailed clinical phenotyping followed by DNA sequencing. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS SETTING
methodsGenetic analysis focused on pathogenic (P) and likely pathogenic (LP) variants and variants of uncertain significance (VUS) within established CHH and CPHD genes. Oligogenicity was assessed in the CHH/syndromic HH cohort (n = 523) compared with controls from 1000 Genomes (n = 601). Genetic overlap among CHH, CPHD, and syndromic Gn deficiency was systematically investigated. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Cleft lip/palate, dental agenesis, and ear abnormalities were recurrent across all Gn-deficient groups. Notably, some CPHD and SOD patients exhibited anosmia and a preserved Gn response to LH-releasing hormone (LHRH) stimulation, indicating a hypothalamic component to their HH. Rare variants in CHH genes were identified in 53% of KS probands (40% P/LP, 13% VUS) and 33% of nCHH probands (23% P/LP, 10% VUS). LARGE SCALE DATA: N/A. LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION: Non-coding and copy number variants were not studied. Functional studies of the new candidate genes for CHH were not undertaken. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE
findingsThis study highlights the importance of comprehensive clinical evaluation and broadened genetic testing in patients with Gn deficiency. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: This work was supported by the Swiss National Foundation (NP) (Grant No. 310030B_201275 to N.P.) and the Natural Science Foundation of Beijing (Grant No. 7244338 to Y.W.). The authors declare no competing interests.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.