Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41873377›Full record

ArticleMedical devices (Auckland, N.Z.)2026

Inter- and Intrarater Reliability of a Novel Ultrasound Doppler Device (earlybird) for Quantitative Assessment of Peripheral Arterial Flow.

Marie Tryland Høiberg, Stine Marie Pauschert Kvamme, Steffen Felle Bentsen, Karoline Løkken, Gudrun Rohde, Hans Torp, Arne Seternes, Erik Mulder Pettersen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical devices (Auckland, N.Z.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Marie Tryland Høiberg *Department of Health and Nursing Science, University of Agder, Kristiansand, Norway.
Stine Marie Pauschert Kvamme *Department of Health and Nursing Science, University of Agder, Kristiansand, Norway.
Steffen Felle Bentsen *Department of Health and Nursing Science, University of Agder, Kristiansand, Norway.
Karoline LøkkenDepartment of Surgery, Sørlandet Hospital Kristiansand, Kristiansand, Norway.
Gudrun RohdeDepartment of Health and Nursing Science, University of Agder, Kristiansand, Norway.
Hans TorpDepartment of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Arne SeternesResearch Center for Medical Equipment, Technology, and Innovation, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.
Erik Mulder PettersenDepartment of Surgery, Sørlandet Hospital Kristiansand, Kristiansand, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-6930-6313

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Growing interest in quantitative Doppler assessment has underscored the need for reliable, operator-independent tools to evaluate peripheral arterial circulation. This study aimed to evaluate the reliability of a novel ultrasound Doppler device (earlybird) for measuring blood-flow velocity in lower-extremity arteries and to validate its consistency across raters. We further explored multiple hemodynamic parameters derived from the Doppler spectrogram to examine their reproducibility and potential clinical applicability. Methods: Thirty-five participants, including 25 with varying degrees of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) and 10 healthy individuals, were recruited. Four raters performed independent measurements of the peripheral blood-flow velocity in each participant (280 measurements). Six blood-flow parameters were extracted from the Doppler spectrograms: peak systolic velocity (PSV), time-averaged velocity (TAV), end-diastolic velocity (EDV), pulsatility index (PI), resistive index (RI), and acceleration time (AT). The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to assess reliability, which was visualized in scatter plots and Bland-Altman plots with 95% limits of agreement. Results: Good correlation and agreement among the different raters were observed, with inter-rater reliability ranging from an ICC of 0.755-0.835 ( Conclusion: Earlybird was shown to be a reliable tool for assessing peripheral arteries across raters, with good inter- and intra-rater reliability. The angle-independent variables, RI and AT, showed narrow 95% limits of agreement, which justifies further exploration.

Indexed as

blood flow velocityinnovationsinter- and intrarater reliabilityperipheral arterial diseaseultrasonography doppler

Identifiers

PMID41873377
PMCPMC13005978

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.