ArticleMedical devices (Auckland, N.Z.)2026
Inter- and Intrarater Reliability of a Novel Ultrasound Doppler Device (earlybird) for Quantitative Assessment of Peripheral Arterial Flow.
Article in Medical devices (Auckland, N.Z.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Growing interest in quantitative Doppler assessment has underscored the need for reliable, operator-independent tools to evaluate peripheral arterial circulation. This study aimed to evaluate the reliability of a novel ultrasound Doppler device (earlybird) for measuring blood-flow velocity in lower-extremity arteries and to validate its consistency across raters. We further explored multiple hemodynamic parameters derived from the Doppler spectrogram to examine their reproducibility and potential clinical applicability. Methods: Thirty-five participants, including 25 with varying degrees of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) and 10 healthy individuals, were recruited. Four raters performed independent measurements of the peripheral blood-flow velocity in each participant (280 measurements). Six blood-flow parameters were extracted from the Doppler spectrograms: peak systolic velocity (PSV), time-averaged velocity (TAV), end-diastolic velocity (EDV), pulsatility index (PI), resistive index (RI), and acceleration time (AT). The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to assess reliability, which was visualized in scatter plots and Bland-Altman plots with 95% limits of agreement. Results: Good correlation and agreement among the different raters were observed, with inter-rater reliability ranging from an ICC of 0.755-0.835 ( Conclusion: Earlybird was shown to be a reliable tool for assessing peripheral arteries across raters, with good inter- and intra-rater reliability. The angle-independent variables, RI and AT, showed narrow 95% limits of agreement, which justifies further exploration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.