ArticleOncoTargets and therapy2026
Integrated CT Radiomics and Circulating Tumor Cell Analysis in Predicting Lung Adenocarcinoma Invasion: A Dual-Center Study with Implications for Personalized Treatment.
Article in OncoTargets and therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to construct a risk prediction model based on radiomics, circulating tumor cells (CTCs), and dual-center clinical data to predict the invasiveness of lung adenocarcinoma, specifically for discriminating between minimally invasive adenocarcinoma (MIA) and invasive adenocarcinoma (IAC). The clinical value of this model in the precise diagnosis of early-stage lung adenocarcinoma was investigated to provide a reference for formulating reasonable treatment plans. Patients and Methods: Clinical data, imaging data, CTCs, and pathological information from 202 patients with lung adenocarcinoma were retrospectively collected and analyzed from two medical centers between May 2022 and July 2023. The 146 cases from medical center 1 were randomly divided into a development set and an internal test set at a 3:2 ratio. The 56 cases from medical center 2 served as an external validation set. Machine learning was employed to analyze preoperative CTC counts and CT radiomic features. A feature selection method based on LASSO regression (with λ determined by the minimum criterion) was used to screen out 12 radiomic features. These features were subsequently incorporated into logistic regression to construct three prediction models: (1) a radiomics model based on radiomic features; (2) a CTCs-clinical data model based on the total development set; and (3) a composite clinical data-radiomics-CTCs model integrating the former two. The optimal model was selected to construct a nomogram. Its goodness-of-fit was assessed using a calibration curve (Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test), and its predictive performance was validated in the external validation set. Results: A total of 107 radiomic features were extracted and categorized into 7 groups: 18 (16.8%) first-order features, 24 (22.4%) gray-level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM) features, 14 (13.1%) gray-level dependence matrix (GLDM) features, 16 (15.0%) each for gray-level run length matrix (GLRLM) and gray-level size zone matrix (GLSZM) features, 5 (4.7%) neighboring gray-tone difference matrix (NGTDM) features, and the remaining (13.1%) were shape-based features. In the total development set, significant differences were observed in clinical-imaging semantic features including CEA, CK19, CTC count, and lesion diameter, which were used to construct the clinical model. The area under the curve (AUC) for the radiomics model was 0.896 95% CI:0.832-0.960. The CTCs-clinical model demonstrated superior performance AUC:0.960, 95% CI:0.926-0.994. The composite clinical-radiomics-CTCs model showed the highest predictive accuracy AUC:0.980, 95% CI:0.960-1.000. According to decision curve analysis and the Akaike information criterion, the composite clinical-radiomics-CTCs model outperformed any single clinical or radiomic feature in terms of clinical predictive capability. Conclusion: For assessing the invasiveness of early-stage lung adenocarcinoma, the radiomics approach can effectively discriminate between MIA and IAC. However, compared to single-modality methods, the composite clinical-radiomics-CTCs model offers a novel auxiliary diagnostic method for evaluating the risk of invasiveness in early-stage lung cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.