Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41873354›Full record

ArticleComputational statistics2026

A reduced basis decomposition approach to efficient data collection in pairwise comparison studies.

Jiahua Jiang, Joseph Marsh, Rowland Seymour

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational statistics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jiahua JiangSchool of Mathematics, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, B5 7US United Kingdom.
Joseph MarshSchool of Mathematics, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, B5 7US United Kingdom.
Rowland SeymourSchool of Mathematics, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, B5 7US United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-8739-3921

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Comparative judgement studies elicit quality assessments of objects through pairwise comparisons, typically analysed using the Bradley-Terry model. A challenge in these studies is experimental design, specifically, determining the optimal pairs to compare to maximize statistical efficiency. Constructing static experimental designs for these studies requires spectral decomposition of a covariance matrix over pairs of pairs, which becomes computationally infeasible for studies with a large number of objects. We propose a scalable method based on reduced basis decomposition that bypasses explicit construction of this matrix, achieving computational savings of two to three orders of magnitude. We establish eigenvalue bounds guaranteeing approximation quality and characterise the rank structure of the design matrix. Simulations demonstrate speedup factors exceeding 100 for studies with 64 or more objects, with negligible approximation error. We apply the method to construct designs for a 452-region spatial study in under 7 min, which was not previously possible, and enable real-time design updates for classroom peer assessment, reducing computation time from 15 min to 15 s.

Indexed as

Bradley–TerryComparative judgementMatrix approximationScalable algorithms

Identifiers

PMID41873354
PMCPMC13005856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.