ReviewNeuropsychiatric disease and treatment2026
Machine Learning-Based Depression Risk Prediction Models for Older Adults Analyzing From the Perspective of the Health Ecology Model: A Scoping Review.
Review in Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This review systematically examined the current research on machine learning-based depression risk prediction models for domestic and international older adults, aiming to provide references for methodological development and application in this field. Design: A scoping review approach was used, following the Participants, Concept, and Context (PCC) framework and incorporating the Health Ecology Model (HEM) as the analytical theoretical framework. Methods: Based on the PCC principles, the study scope was defined, and a systematic search was conducted in Web of Science, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, CINAHL, CNKI, VIP Database, Wanfang Database, and the Chinese Biomedical Literature Database for literature related to depression in older adults, covering publications up to October 12, 2025. Two researchers independently screened the literature, extracted data, and summarized and analyzed the papers' content. Results: After screening and full-text review, 15 studies on machine learning-based depression risk prediction models for older adults were included. A total of 90 risk prediction models were covered, with area under the curve (AUC) values ranging from 0.73 to 0.943. Most models were only internally validated, with only 20 models undergoing external validation. Predictors of depression in older adults were mainly at the individual intrinsic traits level (e.g. age, gender, number of chronic diseases, cognitive scores, pain) and the behavioral characteristics level (e.g. sleep duration, physical activity, smoking, drinking) of the HEM. At the same time, interpersonal network, community, environmental, and policy-level factors were less involved. These models are applicable in various settings, including community health service centers, outpatient clinics, long-term care institutions, and home health management. Conclusion: Research on depression risk prediction models for older adults in China is still in its early stages. Existing models demonstrate good predictive performance, with a manageable risk of bias, and can provide more reliable decision support for healthcare professionals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.