ArticleCureus2026
Are Rotator Cuff Tears in Anterior Shoulder Dislocation Associated With a High Critical Shoulder Angle? A Retrospective Analysis.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims This study aims to investigate whether the critical shoulder angle (CSA) could serve as an effective screening tool to predict acute rotator cuff tears in patients with first-time anterior glenohumeral dislocation and to assess the inter- and intra-observer reliability of CSA measurements in this cohort. Methods A review of all patients with a first-time anterior shoulder dislocation was carried out over a 17-month period at Manchester NHS Foundation Trust, across the Wythenshawe Hospital and Manchester Royal Infirmary sites. Three shoulder surgeons independently measured CSA on post-reduction radiographs, and all patients underwent imaging to assess for a traumatic rotator cuff tear (RCT). Statistical analysis was performed using unpaired t-tests and subgroup analysis based on age and rotator cuff tear presence. Inter- and intra-observer reliability was assessed using Cronbach's alpha. Results Sixty-five patients (36 female, 29 male) met the inclusion criteria. Forty-two patients (65%) had a rotator cuff tear detected on further imaging. The mean CSA for the tear group was 38.14° (SD 4.6), and for the non-tear group, it was 37.45° (SD 4.6), with no significant difference (p = 0.5598). Age was significantly higher in the tear group (64.5 years) compared to the non-tear group (58.1 years, p = 0.0225), with a positive correlation between age and the likelihood of sustaining a rotator cuff tear. Inter-observer reliability was found to be "good" (Cronbach's alpha = 0.8519), while intra-observer reliability was "excellent" (Cronbach's alpha ≥ 0.9282). Conclusion This study found no significant association between CSA and the incidence of rotator cuff tears following a traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation. However, increasing age was associated with a higher likelihood of sustaining a rotator cuff tear following anterior shoulder dislocation. This study has demonstrated that intra- and inter-observer reliability were excellent and good, respectively. These findings suggest that CSA may not be a reliable screening tool for rotator cuff tears following shoulder dislocation. Larger, standardised studies are needed to further explore this relationship.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.