Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41873253›Full record

ArticleJournal of asthma and allergy2026

Salbutamol Reversal of Methacholine Induced Bronchoconstriction: Vibrating Mesh Nebulizer versus Pressurized Metered Dose Inhaler.

Beth E Davis, Brianne S Philipenko, Donald W Cockcroft

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of asthma and allergy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Beth E DavisDivision of Respirology and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Brianne S PhilipenkoDivision of Respirology and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Donald W CockcroftDivision of Respirology and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Reversal of methacholine induced bronchoconstriction (MIB) is routinely achieved by administering 200 mcg salbutamol via pressurized metered dose inhaler (pMDI). The propellant in the inhaler (hydrofluoroalkane-134a) contributes to greenhouse gas emissions, negatively impacting the environment. One alternative to delivering bronchodilator would be using the Aerogen Methods: Sixteen individuals exhibiting airway hyperresponsiveness to methacholine completed a double blind, double dummy, placebo controlled, randomized, three-way crossover study. At each visit, participants underwent MCT followed by administration of placebo or salbutamol (200 mcg) via pMDI or VMN. Lung function and heart rate measurements were captured before and at 5, 10, 15, 30, 45 and 60 minutes after treatment administration. Results: Pre MCT FEV Conclusion: Use of the VMN for delivering salbutamol to reverse MIB is feasible. Doing so adds functionality to the use of this nebulizer for performing methacholine bronchoprovocation and reduces the negative environmental impact of pMDI inhalers.

Indexed as

methacholinepMDIsalbutamolvibrating mesh nebulizer

Identifiers

PMID41873253
PMCPMC13005985

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.