ArticleCancer research communications2026
Real-World Characterization and Treatment Patterns of Patients with Desmoid Tumors at an Academic Center in the United States.
Article in Cancer research communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Real-world studies on desmoid tumors (DT) are limited due to its low incidence. Therefore, we aimed to characterize the patient journey in DTs from diagnosis to treatment at an academic center in the United States. A retrospective cohort study was conducted at the University of Utah Health network. Eligible patients were diagnosed with DTs between January 1, 2011, and July 31, 2023, were ≥18 years old at diagnosis, and had ≥2 DT-related encounters. Patient and tumor characteristics, reports of symptoms, and treatment patterns were abstracted from electronic health records. Healthcare resource utilization was quantified using administrative claims. Patients who potentially had a misdiagnosis ≤2 years before DT diagnosis were identified based on billing codes of conditions commonly diagnosed instead of DTs. Among 148 eligible patients, 59.5% had documentation of ≥1 DT-related symptom during the follow-up period. Pain was the most common reported symptom (57.4%). 79.7% of patients received ≥1 line of active treatment; some received up to 10 lines of therapy. Healthcare resource utilization was higher during periods of symptomatic disease and among patients with potential misdiagnosis (29.1%) in the year before DT diagnosis. Although surgery was the most common treatment, its use decreased across the study period with a corresponding expansion of systemic treatment modalities used as first-line treatment. In conclusion, increased healthcare resource utilization associated with misdiagnosis highlights the need for timely and accurate DT diagnosis. The varied treatment approaches and multiple lines of therapy suggest the need for optimal therapeutic agents. Surgery rates have decreased, aligning with evolving treatment guidelines. SIGNIFICANCE: DT remains an understudied disease area despite its high morbidity. Due to limited data on treatment patterns and outcomes, particularly in the United States, gaps in the management of DTs are not well elucidated. Therefore, we aimed to describe the patient journey in DTs within our health system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.