ArticleMolecular genetics & genomic medicine2026
Clinical Utility of Prenatal cfDNA Screening for Sex Chromosome Aneuploidies: A Single Center Experience.
Article in Molecular genetics & genomic medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionTo assess the clinical efficacy of prenatal cfDNA screening for detecting sex chromosome aneuploidies (SCAs). MATERIAL AND
methodsWe conducted a retrospective study at a single center including women with singleton pregnancies who underwent prenatal cfDNA screening between January 2020 and December 2024. Cases with high-risk cfDNA screening results for SCAs were reviewed for confirmatory diagnostic results, prenatal ultrasound findings, and pregnancy outcomes. Positive predictive values (PPVs) were calculated for each SCA subtype, and associations between ultrasound findings and confirmed SCAs were analyzed.
resultsA total of 252 pregnancies (252/58720, 0.43%) were identified as high-risk cfDNA screening results for SCAs, including 224 fetal and 28 maternal cases. The fetal SCAs comprised 101 cases of 45,X, 37 of 47,XXX, 55 of 47,XXY, and 31 of 47,XYY. Among them, 173 underwent invasive diagnosis, confirming 90 true SCA cases with a PPV of 52.0%. For 45,X, there was a trend toward a higher detection rate in those with abnormal ultrasound findings compared to those with normal ultrasound results (4/20 vs. 8/127, p = 0.060), though it did not reach statistical significance; no significant differences were observed for sex chromosome trisomies. Of the 16 maternal SCA cases that underwent invasive testing, all fetuses had normal karyotypes.
conclusionsOur findings demonstrated prenatal cfDNA screening as a unique approach to achieve effective detection of fetal SCAs, particularly those that otherwise would be overlooked by routine prenatal ultrasound screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.