ArticleThoracic research and practice2026
Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Version of the Lung Transplant-specific Valued Life Activities Scale.
Article in Thoracic research and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe lung transplantation-specific valued life activities (LT-VLA) is a 15-item questionnaire developed to assess limitations in activities of daily living in LT recipients. This study aimed to evaluate the validity and reliability of its Turkish version. MATERIAL AND
methodsTwenty-two LT recipients participated in this single-center cross-sectional study. Test-retest reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), and internal consistency was measured with Cronbach's alpha (α). Criterion validity was examined by comparing LT-VLA scores with the Saint George Respiratory Questionnaire, Short Form-12 (SF-12), London Chest Activity of Daily Living Scale (LCADL), and modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) scale.
resultsCronbach's α values for the mean difficulty, activities affected, and activities unable subscales were 0.945, 0.906, and 0.934, respectively. ICC values ranged from 0.828 to 0.897. The mean difficulty score showed a moderate correlation with LCADL self-care (r = 0.543,
conclusionThe Turkish version of the LT-VLA is a reliable and valid tool for assessing activity limitations in LT recipients. It will be a useful and feasible tool for rehabilitation professionals to assess activity limitations in LT recipients undergoing pulmonary rehabilitation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.