ArticleAnnals of transplantation2026
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Liver Transplantation: Safety Under an Immunosuppression-Preserving Strategy.
Article in Annals of transplantation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are widely used as first-line combination therapies for many cancers. However, ICIs are associated with an increased risk of graft rejection in patients requiring liver transplants, and the tumor response rate has yet to be determined. MATERIAL AND METHODS This retrospective study included liver transplant recipients who received ICIs for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma. During ICI therapy, baseline immunosuppressant doses were maintained, with low-dose steroid treatments added when clinically indicated. RESULTS A total of 25 patients were included, with 12 receiving ICIs as first-line therapy, and 13 as second-line therapy. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.93 months (95% CI, 2.33-28.63) and 7.20 months (3.80-32.47), respectively. One patient (4.0%) developed grade 2 hepatitis, and 2 (8%) experienced grade 3 gastrointestinal bleeding. Concurrent steroid use was associated with fewer immune-related adverse events (0% vs 30%, P=0.052) but showed a trend toward shorter PFS (HR=2.30, P=0.071). Two patients (8%) achieved complete remission, and 4 (16%) maintained disease control for more than 1 year. In multivariable analysis, recurrence within 1 year after transplantation was the only significant prognostic factor for PFS (HR=2.98, P=0.043). CONCLUSIONS Our findings suggest that ICIs can be administered after liver transplantation without reducing baseline immunosuppressant doses, potentially minimizing the risk of fatal allograft rejection while still allowing antitumor activity. These results should be interpreted cautiously, and larger studies are needed to define the safe and appropriate use of ICIs in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.