Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41872975›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of nursing practice2026

Examining the Effectiveness of Typologies of Violence Used in Predicting and Responding to Workplace Violence Against Nurses: A Rapid Review.

Joel Robert McGregor, Jamie Ung, James Roffee, Karrie Long

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of nursing practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Joel Robert McGregorSwinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3336-2190
Jamie UngSwinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-5027-0119
James RoffeeFederation University Australia, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Karrie LongSafer Care Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe rate of violence against nurses far exceeds what should be reasonably accepted and suggests this is an issue that requires targeted intervention. Typologies have been used to predict violence, but there is a gap in the literature on antecedent and precipitating factors that lead to violence against nurses.

aimThe aims were to (1) identify typologies of workplace violence used in nursing literature, (2) evaluate evidence for their effectiveness in predicting escalation and/or guiding responses and (3) synthesise antecedent and precipitating factors absent from existing typologies.

designThis article utilises a rapid review methodological framework, with emphasis on thematic construction to present current typologies of violence. DATA SOURCES: A search of academic literature was carried out in ProQuest Central, EBSCO and Web of Science databases. REVIEW

methodsArticles were limited to English-language peer-reviewed studies published between 2017 and 2022. Two-stage screening (title/abstract then full text) was undertaken independently by three authors, with disagreements resolved through discussion. Data were extracted on typology use, evidence of predictive/response utility and reported antecedent and precipitating factors. Forty-four studies were included, with 26 studies directly informing the present evidence synthesis.

resultsAcross incident-focused studies, typologies were used mainly for descriptive classification of perpetrators or settings, with minimal evaluation of predictive validity or response tailoring. Nurses consistently reported antecedent organisational conditions (e.g., staffing, crowding and safety culture) and precipitating interactional cues (e.g., agitation, escalating tone and perceived delays) that shaped both escalation risk and effective responses but were weakly represented in prevailing typologies.

conclusionExisting typologies help identify likely perpetrators of workplace violence but remain insufficient as stand-alone tools for real-time prediction and response because they omit escalation dynamics. This review contributes an integrative framework linking typology categories to antecedent and precipitating factors nurses can recognise and target.

Indexed as

Workplace ViolenceHumansWorking Conditionsnursingpreventionreportingviolence typologiesworkplace aggressionworkplace violence

Identifiers

PMID41872975
PMCPMC13009316

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.