Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41872970›Full record

ArticleBiology of sex differences2026

Sex differences in the strategies of haptic object memory in early adulthood.

Lea Fröscher, Matthias W Riepe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology of sex differences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lea FröscherGeriatric Psychiatry Section, Clinic for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy II of the University of Ulm at Günzburg District Hospital, Günzburg, Germany. lea.froescher@uni-ulm.de.
Matthias W RiepeGeriatric Psychiatry Section, Clinic for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy II of the University of Ulm at Günzburg District Hospital, Günzburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Everyday life inevitably involves touch. Encoding, recalling, and recognizing objects by touch requires haptic object memory, which is thought to rely on both verbal and visual capabilities. This raises the question of whether performance or strategies used to solve haptic memory tasks are sex-dependent. We assessed 45 healthy young adults (27 females, 18 males; aged 18-36 years) with repeated measurements. Participants were asked to encode ten everyday objects while blindfolded and allowed to explore them by touch. After a five-minute delay, participants were asked to recall as many objects as possible and subsequently to recognize the objects from a set of five conceptually identical but perceptually different alternatives with their eyes open. Regardless of whether participants correctly identified the object, they were then allowed to touch it. Performance did not differ between women and men in all memory phases. However, men appeared to rely less on verbal memory and instead used mental rotation as a compensatory strategy during encoding. Women who in this sample showed better verbal memory performance, did not require such backup strategies for encoding. During the recognition task, the results suggest that men may have relied on mental rotation, whereas women may have favored verbal strategies. These findings indicate a tendency toward different strategy preferences rather than fixed sex-specific mechanisms. However, given the modest sample size, these findings should be interpreted cautiously and warrant replication in larger cohorts. Nonetheless, we conclude that when task demands increase, men may compensate by engaging mental object rotation.

Indexed as

MemorySex CharacteristicsTouchTouch PerceptionAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleRecognition, PsychologyYoung Adultcognitive strategieshaptic object memorysex differencestouchverbal and spatial processing

Identifiers

PMID41872970
PMCPMC13063925

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.