Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41872937›Full record

ArticleTrials2026

An international, multicentre, interventional, randomised, assessor-blinded trial to MAXimise the METHotrexate therapy potential in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (MethMax trial): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Karolina Anderle, Daniela Sieghart, Martina Durechova, François Bonnay, Andreas Kerschbaumer, Katerina Chatzidionysiou, Rachel Knevel, Costantino Pitzalis, Siri Lillegraven, Espen A Haavardsholm and 10 more

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Karolina AnderleDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Guertel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2572-9995
Daniela SieghartDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Guertel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria.
Martina DurechovaDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Guertel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria.
François BonnayDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Guertel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria.
Andreas KerschbaumerDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Guertel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria.
Katerina ChatzidionysiouDepartment of Medicine, Solna, Division of Rheumatology, Karolinska University Hospital at Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Rachel KnevelDepartment of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.
Costantino PitzalisCentre for Experimental Medicine and Rheumatology, William Harvey Research Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London & NIHR BRC Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
Siri LillegravenDepartment of Rheumatology, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Espen A HaavardsholmDepartment of Rheumatology, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Eirik Klami KristianslundDepartment of Rheumatology, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Catalin CodreanuCenter for Rheumatic Diseases, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania.
Claudiu PopescuCenter for Rheumatic Diseases, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania.
Elisa GremeseRheumatology and Clinical Immunology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
Sabina de GeestNursing Science, Department Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Basel, Basel, BS, Switzerland.
Agnes KocherNursing Science, Department Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Basel, Basel, BS, Switzerland.
Souzi MakriPatient Research Partner, EULAR, Nicosia, Cyprus.
Daniel AletahaDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Guertel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria.
Helga Lechner-RadnerDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Guertel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria. helga.lechner-radner@meduniwien.ac.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5908-1525
SQUEEZE Consortium

Funding

HORIZON EUROPE Innovative Europe 101095052
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMethotrexate (MTX) is recommended as first-line therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), proven to be effective, safe and inexpensive. However, a significant proportion of patients does not achieve disease remission with MTX monotherapy. Main reasons include insufficient dose up-titration to the maximal recommended oral dose or the delayed switch to a subcutaneous administration route. We hypothesise, that by dose and route optimisation, a higher proportion of patients can achieve remission. Further, exploratory biomarkers will give new insights on individual MTX metabolism and drug adherence.

methodsThe MethMax trial is a prospective, randomised, assessor-blinded, parallel-group, superiority, low-intervention trial, including 182 patients across 7 European countries. Patients with active RA, naïve to biologic (except tumour necrosis factor alpha inhibitors; TNFi) or targeted synthetic antirheumatic drugs, who have been on a stable oral MTX therapy for the past 3 months are randomised in a 1:1 ratio to 25 mg MTX weekly, either administered orally or subcutaneously. Additionally, both arms receive a short-term glucocorticoid regimen with a four-week tapering and withdrawal protocol. The primary endpoint is the difference in proportion of patients achieving remission defined as the Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) ≤ 2.8 at week 24, comparing the dose/route optimisation and oral dose optimisation. The active study duration for each patient is 24 weeks. Study visits take place at baseline, weeks 4, 12, 16 and 24. Clinical efficacy and safety parameters are obtained at each visit. Patient-reported outcomes, exploratory biomarkers as well as medication adherence are assessed. Written consent is obtained for all participants. The study has received regulatory approval via the Clinical Trials Information System and Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency and has included the first patient in August 2024. DISCUSSION: The anticipated results will provide insights whether the subcutaneous administration of 25 mg MTX is advantageous in achieving CDAI remission when compared to the oral intake after 24 weeks and inform the community regarding the utility of established and newly developed biomarkers, as well as the potential impact of inadequate drug adherence. The MethMax study is aimed to optimise individual therapy in RA and provide more precise pharmacological MTX management recommendations.

Indexed as

Antirheumatic AgentsArthritis, RheumatoidMethotrexateAdministration, OralBiomarkersEquivalence Trials as TopicEuropeGlucocorticoidsHumansInjections, SubcutaneousMedication AdherenceMulticenter Studies as TopicProspective StudiesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRemission InductionTime FactorsAntirheumatic AgentsBiomarkersGlucocorticoidsMethotrexateAdherenceClinical disease activityDigital healthExplorative biomarkersMethotrexatePatient-reported outcomesRheumatoid arthritis

Identifiers

PMID41872937
PMCPMC13036923

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.