ArticleItalian journal of pediatrics2026
Development and validation of a clinical prediction model for neonatal seizures among neonates admitted to public health hospitals in Northwest Ethiopia: retrospective follow-up study.
Article in Italian journal of pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNeonatal seizures are sudden, abnormal brain activities that occur during the neonatal period, are the most common neurological emergencies in newborns, and are associated with high morbidity and mortality rates. Approximately 2–20% of neonates admitted to neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) worldwide experience neonatal seizures. Although established guidelines for managing neonatal seizures are available, no risk prediction models exist to help the clinical decision-making process; thus, the practices remain inconsistent across local facilities and resources. This study aims to develop and validate a neonatal risk prediction model for seizures among neonates admitted to NICUs at comprehensive specialized hospitals in Northwest Ethiopia.
methodsA retrospective follow-up study was conducted among 907 neonates admitted to the NICU in comprehensive specialized hospitals in Northwest Ethiopia. A systematic random sampling technique was employed to select the neonates’ records. Predictors for multivariable binary logistic regression analysis were selected via penalized LASSO for the variable selection method. A risk prediction nomogram was constructed from the simplified model. The discriminatory, prediction and calibration power of the risk prediction model was evaluated. Using the Youden index-identified cutoff point criterion, the level of risk of neonates for seizures was determined. Finally, decision curve analysis was performed to assess its clinical utility. For analysis purposes, Stata 17 and R.4.4.0 were used.
resultsThe incidence of neonatal seizures among neonates admitted to the NICU was 21.39% (95% CI: 18.83, 24.18%). The neonatal risk prediction nomogram was constructed using preterm birth, subgaleal hemorrhage, perinatal asphyxia, maternal history of seizure, hypoglycemia, and phototherapy as independent predictors. The internally validated discriminatory power of the model was 77.735% (95% CI: 73.912%, 81.634%), with a calibration plot test value of 0.056. The optimism coefficient of the simplified model was 0.0197. Decision curve analysis revealed a greater net benefit of the model in clinical practice than the “treat all” or “treat none” strategies did.
conclusionsThe incidence of neonatal seizures among neonates admitted to the NICU was relatively high. The predictive power of the constructed nomogram was good. Despite some limitations, the model offers superior net clinical benefit compared with the “treat all” or “treat none” strategies; however, further external validation is recommended for its wider application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.