ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2026
Couples' symbiotic experience in perinatal vulnerability: a phenomenological qualitative study.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
AIMS AND
objectivesThis study aims to explore the experiences of perinatal vulnerability between expectant mothers and partners, investigating how their vulnerabilities interact, accumulate, or resolve, and identifying coping strategies that strengthen resilience and mutual support.
backgroundThe perinatal period presents significant physical, emotional, and psychological challenges that increase vulnerability for both mothers and partners. While most research focuses primarily on maternal vulnerability, less attention is given to partners and the couple’s dynamic. A deeper understanding of these interrelated vulnerabilities is essential for improving perinatal care.
designA phenomenological qualitative study was conducted through in-depth interviews with 40 participants (22 mothers and 18 partners) at a tertiary hospital in Wuhan, China. Data were analyzed using a thematic analysis approach. The study was designed and reported according to the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research checklist.
resultsThree main themes emerged: (1) “Not Just Her Pain”: Joint Immersion in the Whirlpool of Vulnerability; (2) “We Touch Each Other’s Vulnerability”: The Complex Interweaving of Dual Vulnerability; and (3) “This Is a New Beginning”: Transformation and Growth Through Vulnerability.
conclusionsThis study highlights the need to recognize the interrelated vulnerabilities of both expectant mothers and partners. Positive communication, mutual support, and interrelated decision-making are essential in reducing stress and fostering resilience. The study also enhances healthcare professionals’ ability to identify vulnerable populations not solely based on external factors, enabling more tailored and effective care. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Healthcare providers should adopt a couple-centered approach in perinatal care, emphasizing joint decision-making and emotional support. This approach can improve perinatal outcomes and strengthen the emotional bonds within families.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.