Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41872765›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2026

PALLIHIP-study: Spinal Phenol IN Glycerol (SPING-block) in palliative, frail, older adults with a hip fracture: a study protocol.

Nick Visschers, Miriam van der Velden, Miriam C Faes, Bart Spaetgens, Marieke van den Beuken-van Everdingen, Arnela Suman

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nick VisschersDepartment of Pain Medicine and Palliative Care, Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands.
Miriam van der VeldenDepartment of Pain Medicine and Palliative Care, Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands.
Miriam C FaesDepartment of Geriatrics, Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands.
Bart SpaetgensDepartment of Internal Medicine, Geriatrics Section, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands. bartholomeus.spaetgens@mumc.nl.
Marieke van den Beuken-van EverdingenCare and Publich Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Arnela SumanDepartment of Pain Medicine and Palliative Care, Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands.

Funding

Organization for Health Research and Development (ZonMw) 10200012420031
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the Netherlands, approximately 20,000 older adults sustain a hip fracture every year. Most of these patients are frail, institutionalised, have limited postoperative mobility and a high mortality rate. When surgery is not feasible or preferred, optimizing quality of life and effective pain management becomes paramount. However, current analgesic strategies often fail to provide sustained relief and timely discharge. Timely discharge is essential to prevent hospital-related complications in frail patients. The Spinal Phenol IN Glycerol (SPING) block, a novel intrathecal neurolytic technique adapted from spinal anaesthesia, has been developed as an innovative approach for palliative pain treatment in this patient population. The PALLIHIP study aims to evaluate the effects of the SPING block on pain and quality of life in frail, institutionalised older adults with hip fractures.

methodsPALLIHIP is a prospective multicentre cohort study that will be conducted in 19 Dutch hospitals. PALLIHIP will aim to enroll 210 patients. The primary objective is to evaluate the impact on pain and quality of life, assessed at admission, 24 h, one week, six weeks, and three months after treatment with SPING. Secondary outcomes include complications, mobility level, care dependency, caregiver burden, quality of dying, survival, and patient and caregiver satisfaction. Patient characteristics associated with treatment success will be explored. Healthcare and societal costs will be estimated through activity-based costing and a budget impact model. Semi-structured interviews and focus groups with patients, informal caregivers, and healthcare professionals will explore experiences, preferences, and implementation barriers. Ultimately, the goal is to establish a framework with a standardised protocol for effective, consistent application of the SPING block in clinical practice. DISCUSSION: This study will deliver the first prospective data on clinical effectiveness, patient-centred outcomes, and economic impact of the SPING block in frail, older adults with hip fractures. We hypothesise that the SPING block provides rapid, sustained analgesia with reduced opioid requirements, facilitates early discharge, and improves patient-centered outcomes. Findings may be able to provide evidence to inform future national guideline development and support the development of a standardised protocol for nonoperative palliative fracture care in frail, institutionalised older adults with a hip fracture.

trial registrationClinical trial number: not applicable. The PALLIHIP study is an observational cohort study on palliative fracture care in frail older adults with a hip fracture and was deemed exempt from the Medical Research Involving Human Subjects Act (WMO) by the Medical Ethics Committee of Amphia Hospital (protocol number NW2024-049).

Indexed as

Anesthesia, SpinalFrail ElderlyGlycerolHip FracturesPalliative CareAgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMulticenter Studies as TopicNetherlandsObservational Studies as TopicPain ManagementProspective StudiesGlycerolConservative treatmentFemur fractureFrailNonoperative managementolder individualsPain treatmentPalliative careSPING block

Identifiers

PMID41872765
PMCPMC13130426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.