Observational studyJournal of cataract and refractive surgery2026
Evaluation of spectacle independence with the Dutch Patient-Reported Spectacle Independence Questionnaire.
Observational study in Journal of cataract and refractive surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Characteristics of Patients Achieved Spectacle Independence After Enhanced Monofocal IOL Implantation Targeted at Distance Vision.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate spectacle independence in healthy individuals and cataract patients with different types of intraocular lenses (IOLs) and refractive targets using a Dutch translation of The Patient-Reported Spectacle Independence Questionnaire (PRSIQ). The PRSIQ is a patient-reported outcome measure that assesses patient need for, wearing of, and functioning without spectacles for distance, intermediate, and near vision.
settingAmphia Hospital, Breda, the Netherlands.
designProspective, observational, cross-sectional, single-center study.
methodsThe English questionnaire was translated to Dutch following the ISPOR guidelines. 361 participants across various groups were included: healthy individuals aged younger than and older than 50 years and cataract patients with bilateral implantation of monofocal, enhanced monofocal, toric monofocal, monofocal with a myopic target, extended depth-of-focus (EDOF), or trifocal IOLs.
resultsDichotomous scoring showed significantly different rates of complete spectacle independence: 28 of 49 (57%) for trifocals, 8 of 47 (17%) for EDOFs, 2 of 44 (5%) for monofocals, 1 of 50 (2%) for enhanced monofocals, 0 of 25 (0%) for toric monofocals, 1 of 46 (2%) for myopic targets, and 10 of 50 (20%) and 1 of 50 (2%) for healthy participants younger than and older than 50 years. Participants with minimal refractive errors reported complete spectacle independence in 20 of 28 (71%) with trifocals and 5 of 21 (24%) with EDOF IOLs. Rasch analysis showed that the questionnaire was multidimensional and thus failed to support interval scaling.
conclusionsThe Dutch PRSIQ-NL demonstrated significant differences in self-reported complete spectacle independence across IOL types and refractive targets using dichotomous scoring. Rasch analysis showed PRSIQ-NL cannot be used for interval-scaled measurements. The PRSIQ-NL is valuable for clinical and research applications to evaluate spectacle independence using dichotomous scoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.