Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41872718›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of social psychology2026

Re-imagining space: Conceptualizing new psychological interventions against segregationist attitudes and behaviours.

Maria Ioannou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of social psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Maria IoannouDepartment of Psychology, University of Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4937-7960

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drawing on theories, concepts and empirical evidence from the fields of human geography, social and environmental psychology, this paper argues for space-based interventions as new psychological interventions aiming to address segregationist attitudes and behaviours among co-located groups. The main premise of this argument is that engaging in spatial experiences that cause people to challenge their existing notions of place will impact socio-spatial processes that propagate segregationist practices. These processes concern how people view and attach to their place and how they regard antagonistic groups vis-à-vis place. In presenting space-based interventions, I first explain why space and place are relevant to intergroup interventions aiming at co-existence and why, therefore, a 'spatial shift' in this realm holds promise. I then engage with three different types of space-based activities stipulating their envisioned outcomes: (a) to know more about (the history of) a place; (b) to know the Other in relation to place; and (c) crossing physical and mental boundaries. I conclude with a critical reflection on factors that could impede space-based interventions or undermine their effect, and how the potential of these interventions to engage the body and induce 'ruptures' could ameliorate these constraints.

Indexed as

AttitudeGroup ProcessesPrejudicePsychosocial InterventionSocial BehaviorGroup DynamicsHumansSocial Groupapproach/avoidanceemplaced encountersintergroup interventionssegregationist attitudesspatial intergroup processes

Identifiers

PMID41872718
PMCPMC13009321

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.