Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41872704›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of social psychology2026

Understanding stigma consciousness: A multilevel analysis across diverse stigmatized groups.

Joelle-Cathrin Flöther, Juliane Degner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of social psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Joelle-Cathrin FlötherDepartment of Psychology, University Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-7388-5004
Juliane DegnerDepartment of Psychology, University Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6634-8099

Funding

Bundesministerium für Forschung, Technologie und Raumfahrt (BMFTR)Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft DE1728/4-1Free and Hanseatic City of Hamburg under the Excellence Strategy of the Federal and State Governments
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Members of stigmatized groups differ in how they perceive, reflect on and cope with their stigmatized group status. One potential variable explaining these differences is stigma consciousness: the extent to which individuals expect to be stigmatized based on their group membership (Pinel, J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 76, 1999, 114). However, theorizing and research on predictors of interindividual and between-group variance in stigma consciousness are limited so far. The present research systematically investigated several variables potentially contributing to differences in stigma consciousness at the individual, stigma, and group levels. Multilevel regression modelling using data collected from N = 3969 members of 18 different stigmatized groups revealed that stigma consciousness varies primarily between individuals and less between groups and is largely predicted by individual-level factors, including discrimination experiences, ingroup identification and ideological beliefs. Our findings help to refine the conceptualization of stigma consciousness as an individual psychological characteristic, shaped primarily by individual perceptions and experiences rather than group memberships. Future research directions are discussed, highlighting further individual-level predictors as well as outcomes of stigma consciousness.

Indexed as

ConsciousnessSocial StigmaStereotypingAdultFemaleHumansMaleMultilevel AnalysisSocial GroupYoung Adultdiscrimination experiencesgroup statusstigma consciousnessstigmatizationstigmatized groups

Identifiers

PMID41872704
PMCPMC13009322

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.