ArticleScientific reports2026
Machine learning and response surface analysis of mean drop size and dispersed phase holdup in an L-shaped pulsed sieve plate column.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study explores the hydrodynamic behavior of four distinct nitric acid-TBP/kerosene systems in an L-shaped pulsed sieve-plate column (LPSPC), with a focus on predicting Sauter mean drop diameter (SMDD) and dispersed phase holdup (DPH). The complex interactions between operating parameters, pulsation intensity, flow rate, and hydrodynamic performance were modeled using response surface methodology (RSM) and artificial neural networks (ANN). This is the first side-by-side assessment of ANN versus RSM for LPSPC. The model was trained on experimental dataset, with 70% for training, 15% for validation, and 15% for testing, respectively. A compact two-hidden-layer topology with 10 and 5 neurons with trainbr was selected after a systematic search over 1–4 layers and three training algorithms. The ANN model achieved R2 values of 0.9950, 0.9970, 0.9900, and 0.9822 with MSE values of 0.000314, 0.000451, 0.000019, and 0.000001 for SMDD-horizontal, SMDD-vertical, DPH-horizontal, and DPH-vertical, respectively. At the same time, RSM was slightly better for SMDD-vertical. Complementing these data-driven models, new dimensionless semi-empirical correlations derived via Buckingham’s π-theorem agreed well with experiments, yielding AAREs of 6.95% and 8.29% for SMDD, and 6.56% and 8.68% for DPH in horizontal. Together, these tools provide accurate and usable surrogates for analyzing and optimizing extraction systems relevant to the purification of yellow cake.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.