ArticleNature medicine2026
Diet-microbiome associations in 10,068 individuals from the Human Phenotype Project to guide personalized nutrition.
Article in Nature medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Maternal Diglyceride Diet Attenuates Selected Metabolic Effects of Maternal High-Fat Feeding in Offspring via Energy Metabolism and Microbiota Modulation.Food science & nutrition · 2026Article
- Coffee, the Gut Microbiome, and Host Metabolism: Gastrointestinal Fate, Microbial Transformation, Mechanistic Insights, and Prospects for Precision Nutrition.Metabolites · 2026Review
- Maternal and infant gut microbiome.iMeta · 2026Review
- Gut microbiota in health and disease.Molecular biomedicine · 2026Review
- From Food Systems to Gut Microbiota: Dietary Substrates, Microbial Exposure and One Health.Microorganisms · 2026Review
- Diet-microbiome associations.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2026Article
- Precision microbiome medicine and therapeutics: the enabling role of in vitro gut models.FEMS microbiology reviews · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diet is a major environmental factor influencing the human gut microbiome. However, the effects of specific foods and dietary patterns on microbial composition, diversity and function is not fully understood, limiting progress toward personalized dietary strategies. Here, leveraging 10,068 participants from the Human Phenotype Project with app-based diet logs and shotgun metagenomics, we predicted diet-microbiome associations at species-level resolution. Diet significantly predicted microbial diversity (richness r = 0.26, Shannon Index r = 0.24), the relative abundance of 669 of 724 species tested (92.4%, false discovery rate <0.05), and 313 of 320 pathways (97.8%, false discovery rate <0.05). Feature attribution identified distinct food-microbe links, including coffee with Lawsonibacter asaccharolyticus (r = 0.43), yogurt with Streptococcus thermophilus (r = 0.42) and milk with Bifidobacterium species (r = 0.31-0.36). In parallel, broader dietary patterns, especially the degree of food processing, emerged as predictors of microbial diversity and composition. We also show that diet-microbiome associations persist over four years, with 82.5% of species exhibiting significant longitudinal tracking between predicted and observed abundances. Finally, we developed an exploratory analysis for simulating personalized dietary interventions with predicted microbiome shift effects that are associated with improvements in cardiometabolic health. Our findings demonstrate that diet is strongly associated with microbiome composition, diversity and function, and highlight its potential for guiding personalized interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41872600What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.