Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41872587›Full record

ArticleJournal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology2026

Regional impact of extreme temperatures on cardiovascular and respiratory mortality in Thailand: cold wave burden across diverse tropical climate zones.

Phichet Khunthong, Panuwat Vittayapraparat, Sitthichok Puangthongthub

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Phichet KhunthongIndustrial Toxicology and Risk Assessment Graduate Program, Department of Environmental Science, Faculty of Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-5594-2680
Panuwat VittayapraparatIndustrial Toxicology and Risk Assessment Graduate Program, Department of Environmental Science, Faculty of Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-4415-8973
Sitthichok PuangthongthubIndustrial Toxicology and Risk Assessment Graduate Program, Department of Environmental Science, Faculty of Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand. sitthichok.p@chula.ac.th.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4567-7571

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExtreme temperature events (ETEs) are established mortality risks, yet evidence from tropical regions, especially on cold waves, remains limited. Most studies focus on urban heat, applying uniform national thresholds, which may overlook risks in climatically diverse regions. Using locally relevant ETEs definitions can better capture region-specific risks.

objectiveTo investigate and compare the impacts of heat waves and cold waves on cardiovascular and respiratory mortality across 6 regions of Thailand, highlighting region-specific ETEs risks and vulnerable subpopulations.

methodsEighteen ETEs (HW1-HW9, CW1-CW9) were defined using station-specific temperature percentiles over 2-4 consecutive days. We conducted a two-stage time-series analysis of daily cardiovascular and respiratory mortality (2014-2022). Distributed lag non-linear models were fitted to data from 67 air monitoring stations, adjusting for air quality index, time trends, meteorological confounders, and COVID-19 lockdown effects. Region-specific relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated over a lag of 0-21 days. A random-effects meta-analysis was used to pool region-specific risks. Vulnerable subgroup analyses were conducted by sex, age, and sub-diseases.

resultsCold waves showed stronger and longer mortality effects than heat waves, with variation across definitions, regions, and subgroups. Cardiovascular mortality rose by 7.6% with cold waves (RR = 1.076; 95% CI: 1.061-1.090, lag 0-3), with a higher risk in females (8.9%) than males (7.0%). Heat waves elevated cardiovascular mortality by 2.4% among adults <65. Regionally, the central region had the highest cold wave-related cardiovascular risk (CW9), while the northeast showed the strongest respiratory mortality with cold waves (CW9). Heat waves in the northeast and north increased cardiovascular (HW9, HW9) and respiratory (HW4, HW2) deaths, respectively. Nation pooled sub-disease analyses showed elevated cold-related risks for cerebrovascular deaths (RR = 1.108; 1.084-1.132) and chronic lower respiratory disease (RR = 1.059; 1.043-1.075). SIGNIFICANCE: Both heat and cold waves increased mortality in Thailand, with cold waves showing stronger and longer effects. These findings highlight the need for targeted adaptation strategies, including warning systems and insulation, especially in tropical settings. IMPACT: This study added to the limited global evidence on extreme temperature-related mortality in tropical regions, especially cold waves, which emphasized a greater and more prolonged cardiovascular mortality risk than heat waves in Thailand. It was found to contrast with patterns seen in cold countries. Regional risks varied across the country's diverse tropical climate zones. These findings highlighted the urgent need for public health interventions in tropical settings that address not only heat waves but also the underestimated burden of cold waves.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesCold TemperatureExtreme ColdRespiratory Tract DiseasesTropical ClimateFemaleHot TemperatureHumansMaleThailandAir PollutionCardiovascular and respiratory mortalityClimate ChangeEpidemiologyExposure assessmentRisk assessment

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.