ArticleNature human behaviour2026
The effect of praise from peers on empathy and political inclusion towards racial or ethnic outgroups.
Article in Nature human behaviour, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The effect of praise from peers on empathy and political inclusion towards racial or ethnic outgroups.Nature human behaviour · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Outgroup bias is well documented and pernicious, manifesting in negative attitudes and behaviour towards outgroups. Addressing it is a first-order priority for Diversity, Equity and Inclusion programmes, as well as society more generally. Empathy-taking the perspective and understanding the experiences of others-holds promise for attenuating outgroup bias, but existing methods are expensive. Through seven pilots, we develop a low-cost, easily scalable 'peer praise' intervention that encourages empathy. In this report, we experimentally test (N = 5,303) whether our intervention promotes empathy and inclusive behaviour/attitudes among White US respondents towards Black and Latino/a Americans, a context where outgroup bias is particularly durable. We measure costly choices to engage in empathy, test whether peer praise promotes political (an index of letter writing and donations) and attitudinal (an index of social distance and thermometer ratings) inclusion, and, in a separate experiment (N = 4,404), test whether praise specifically from co-partisans can also promote inclusion. We find that peer praise for empathy neither motivates White participants to engage in empathy for racial outgroups, nor changes their attitudes or self-reported empathy towards outgroups. However, peer praise for empathy does encourage politically inclusive behaviour towards racial outgroups in the form of writing letters on behalf of racial equality to the government. Other registered analyses show that peer praise for empathy can change attitudes both in the short term (Wave 1) and over time (in our longitudinal Wave 2) but only for certain subgroups. Overall, this study provides an examination of a treatment to promote outgroup empathy. That treatment is demonstrated to be effective for behavioural outcomes related to political inclusion across all respondents and can even change attitudes, although only for some demographics. Broadly, our study suggests the importance of targeting empathy-promoting interventions towards receptive groups as well as the difficulty in promoting outgroup empathy, particularly when group identity is highlighted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.