SynthesisArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2026
Pelvic insufficiency fractures after radiation therapy for pelvic cancer in female patients: an updated meta-analysis of 11,272 patients.
Synthesis in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPelvic insufficiency fractures (PIFs) are a debilitating complication of pelvic radiotherapy (RT) for pelvic cancer in female patients, which could lead to a sharp decline in patients’ quality of life. A 2019 meta-analysis by Lucas Gomes Sapienza reported a PIF rate of 14%, but advancements in RT techniques (IMRT, VMAT, C-ion RT) and new published studies necessitate an updated analysis. This study aimed to re-evaluate PIF incidence, fracture location, and associated factors using recent high-quality evidence.
methodsA systematic search of PubMed, Web of Science and Cochrane Library (1980–April 2025) with cohort studies for gynecologic/anal/rectal cancers, pelvic insufficiency fractures. Data on PIF incidence, location, and RT methods were extracted. Random-effects models were used to address expected high heterogeneity. Subgroup analyses were explored in detail.
resultsThe pooled PIF incidence was 17% (95% CI: 15–20%), higher than the prior 14% estimate. Sacral bone/sacroiliac joint involvement dominated (71%), followed by pubic bone (11.6%). Subgroup analyses revealed higher PIF rates with definitive RT (25%) vs. adjuvant RT (6%). Modern RT techniques (IMRT: 8%, 3D-CRT: 11%) reduced PIF risk vs. historical methods (AP/PA: 22%, 4-field: 18%). However, VMAT and C-ion RT showed elevated rates (30%), likely due to higher doses (≥ 55 Gy). Regional difference indicates Europe (23%) > Asia (20%) > USA (9%). MRI detected more PIFs (19%) than other modalities (14%). Low BMI (16%) and menopause (18%) correlated with higher PIF risk.
conclusionThe incidence of PIF after pelvic RT has risen in recent years. Sacral regions are highly likely to develop PIF. Modern RT techniques like IMRT are required, along with routine MRI surveillance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.