ArticleBiological cybernetics2026
challenging synchronization-based network reconstruction from time series: a critical evaluation using Fitzhugh-Nagumo neural networks.
Article in Biological cybernetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The reconstruction of complex networks from time series data has become a common practice in neuroscience and dynamical systems, particularly using synchronization-based measures such as phase locking value (PLV) or correlation. However, the validity of such reconstructions-especially the assumption that synchronization implies direct coupling-remains questionable. In this work, we critically investigate the relationship between structural connectivity and functional synchronization in networks of coupled FitzHugh-Nagumo (FHN) neurons. We generate synthetic networks with known topologies (regular, small-world, and scale-free) and compute pairwise synchronization from the resulting time series. A functional network is then reconstructed based on synchronization strength, and its adjacency matrix is compared with the original structural network using the Root Mean Square Error (RMSE). Our results demonstrate that high synchronization between nodes does not necessarily indicate a direct structural link, and conversely, structurally coupled nodes may remain desynchronized. These findings challenge the reliability of synchronization-based network inference methods and call for caution in interpreting functional connectivity as structural connectivity, particularly in brain network studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41872495What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.