ReviewActa pharmacologica Sinica2026
Pathophysiological roles of neural stem cells in neuropsychiatric diseases: from plasticity to pharmacological targeting.
Review in Acta pharmacologica Sinica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neural stem cells (NSCs) persist throughout adulthood and contribute to circuit maintenance through controlled neurogenesis and trophic, metabolic, and immunomodulatory signaling. However, across neurological and psychiatric disorders, NSCs are not passive bystanders but direct targets of disease pathology and active participants in its progression. Evidence from stroke, Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, epilepsy, depression, anxiety, bipolar disorder, autism spectrum disorder, and schizophrenia shows that pathogenic conditions, such as neuroinflammation, oxidative and metabolic stress, and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis dysregulation disrupt intrinsic NSC programs. These insults suppress NSC activation, impair lineage commitment, and alter the NSC secretome in ways that exacerbate synaptic dysfunction and network instability. Despite interest in NSC-based transplantation, structural replacement remains constrained by poor survival, migration, long-range integration, and safety considerations. In contrast, paracrine mechanisms and extracellular vesicles drive more consistent functional benefits by suppressing neuroinflammation, protecting vulnerable neurons, restoring neurovascular integrity, and modulating immune and metabolic homeostasis. NSCs with gene editing, bioengineered scaffolds, extracellular matrix-mimetic hydrogels, and exosome-based delivery offer renewed translational potential. By repositioning NSCs as both vulnerable targets and mechanistic drivers of disease rather than secondary responders, this review reframes shared pathological processes across brain disorders and highlights NSCs as a tractable entry point for therapeutic intervention and circuit repair.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41872484What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.