ArticleScientific reports2026
CT-to-MRI translation of medical volume data based on an enhanced diffusion model.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In clinical practice, medical inter-modality imaging results can assist doctors in making better decisions, as different modalities imaging results can provide complementary information. Traditionally, obtaining these imaging results requires using various medical devices to scan patients, which can be time-consuming, costly, and potentially harmful to the patient. Motivated by the need to address these limitations, we propose an alternative method that facilitates the conversion of volume CT into volume MRI. The method is based on a Diffusion model and incorporates a post-processing approach to enhance the model's output. To validate our approach, we conduct experiments and achieve good results on brain and pelvic datasets obtained from clinical practice, despite approximately 6% of the slices being incompletely paired. We also compare our method with state-of-the-art techniques, both qualitatively and quantitatively. Our experimental results show that our method outperforms state-of-the-art techniques, including MedSynthesisV1, CycleGAN, Pix2Pix and Diffusion, when using ground truth as a reference. Finally, we conduct an experiment to select the optimal hyperparameters, including the number of epochs and the parameters [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text].
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.