ArticleScientific reports2026
Association of thiamine supplementation with 30-day mortality among ICU patients with sepsis-associated delirium.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sepsis-associated delirium (SAD) is a common and severe complication in critically ill patients and is associated with increased mortality. Thiamine is an essential coenzyme in mitochondrial energy metabolism, and deficiency is frequent in critical illness. However, the association between thiamine supplementation and survival in ICU patients with SAD remains unclear. We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the MIMIC-IV (v3.1) database. Adult ICU patients meeting Sepsis-3 criteria and diagnosed with delirium during ICU stay were included. Patients were categorized according to thiamine supplementation during ICU admission. Propensity score-based methods, including matching, adjustment, and multiple weighting approaches, were applied to balance baseline covariates. The primary outcome was 30-day all-cause mortality. We performed survival, subgroup, and sensitivity analyses. We also conducted duration-response and dose-response analyses to evaluate whether thiamine treatment duration and average daily dose were associated with prognosis. In the MIMIC-IV cohort, 332 ICU patients with sepsis-associated delirium received thiamine supplementation, while 956 did not. Thirty-day mortality was significantly lower in the thiamine group compared with the non-thiamine group (P < 0.001). Thiamine use was associated with improved survival in crude analysis and remained significantly associated with lower 30-day mortality after multivariable adjustment (HR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.33-0.79; P = 0.002). Consistent associations were observed across propensity score analyses, including propensity score-adjusted analysis (HR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.40-0.85; P = 0.005), propensity score matching (HR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.39-0.90; P = 0.015), inverse probability of treatment weighting (HR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.38-0.77; P = 0.002), standardized mortality ratio weighting (HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.47-0.98; P = 0.052), pairwise algorithmic weighting (HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.40-0.97; P = 0.016), and overlap weight (HR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.36-1.02; P = 0.008). Weighted subgroup analyses demonstrated consistent associations across clinical strata, with a significant interaction by illness severity indicating a survival benefit of thiamine among patients with SOFA scores < 4. Duration-response and dose-response analyses suggested greater benefit with longer treatment courses and lower daily dosing. Thiamine supplementation was associated with reduced 30-day mortality in ICU patients with sepsis-associated delirium, with an observed interaction in the SOFA score subgroup, where a SOFA score below 4 was associated with survival benefit. Duration-response and dose-response analyses suggested greater benefit with longer treatment courses and lower daily dosing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.