ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026
Extubation Decision Support in Critical Care: A Multimodal Machine Learning Framework Integrating Segmented Radiographs and Routine Clinical Data.
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Extubation failure remains a major challenge in critically ill patients and is associated with adverse clinical outcomes. Current extubation decisions rely heavily on weaning tests and subjective interpretation of chest radiographs. This study aimed to develop a clinically feasible multimodal machine learning (ML) framework that integrates routinely available data to provide complementary support for extubation decision-making. A total of 921 individuals were included and classified into extubation-with-reintubation and extubation-without-reintubation groups. The proposed framework integrated baseline demographics, weaning measurements, radiographic assessments, and segmented post-intubation chest x-rays (i.e., tracheal, left lung, and right lung regions). Optimal base ML models for each modality were selected based on the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and integrated using a stacking ensemble approach. Feature importance analyses were performed at both the modality and feature levels. The extubation-with-reintubation group comprised a higher proportion of elderly patients with higher Charlson comorbidity index scores than the extubation-without-reintubation group. Individuals requiring reintubation exhibited significantly higher respiratory rates, lower tidal volumes, greater rapid shallow breathing indices, and longer intervals from intubation to weaning tests and extubation (all p < 0.01). The multimodal ensemble outperformed rule-based and single-modality models, achieving an accuracy of 79.46%. Weaning measurements, demographics, and radiographic assessments were the most influential contributors to extubation outcome prediction. A multimodal ML framework integrating segmented post-intubation chest x-rays with routinely collected clinical data shows potential as a complementary, objective decision-support tool for extubation without requiring additional measurements. Prospective studies are needed to further validate these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41872394What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.