ArticleScientific reports2026
Effects of sensory IEQ comfort on employees' indoor satisfaction and well-being in overall office spaces: a multi-group SEM approach.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Indoor Environmental Quality (IEQ) in office settings plays a critical role in occupant satisfaction and well-being, directly influencing health, productivity, and overall quality of life. Current research, however, lacks an integrated understanding of the mechanisms linking sensory IEQ comfort to satisfaction and well-being. Furthermore, many studies overlook the interactive effects of IEQ across different functional spaces, which may lead to biased estimations of IEQ's impact on well-being. To address these gaps, this study collected 264 valid questionnaires from employees across nine floors in four office buildings. The survey encompassed sensory IEQ Comfort, Total Environmental Comfort Vote (TECV), Work Environmental Satisfaction (WESA), Work Satisfaction (WSA), and Life Satisfaction (LSA). A multi-group Structural Equation Model (SEM) was employed for multi-spatial integrated analysis. The results indicate that Sensory IEQ comfort in Leisure Space (LS) exhibits more significant pathways to LSA compared to Work Space (WS). In both WS and LS, IEQ comfort promotes WESA and WSA primarily through the mediation of TECV; notably, the impact of WESA is more pronounced in LS. WSA serves as a stronger driver of LSA than WESA in the office. The multi-spatial model significantly reduced the effect sizes of independent pathways compared to single-space models, suggesting that neglecting spatial diversity may lead to result errors. Furthermore, computer usage time was identified as a core factor influencing WESA and WSA, and indirectly affecting LSA. This study provides explicit design guidance for optimizing sensory IEQ to enhance occupant well-being and emphasizes the necessity of multi-spatial considerations in office design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.