ArticleNature methods2026
Integration of alternative fragmentation techniques into standard LC-MS workflows using a single deep learning model enhances proteome coverage.
Article in Nature methods, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluating the Performance of Photon- and Electron-Based Fragmentation Methods in Omnitrap-LCMS Analysis ofAnalytical chemistry · 2026Article
- Investigating the Efficiency of Ultraviolet Photodissociation in Peptides Modified withJournal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Bottom-up proteomics relies predominantly on collision-induced dissociation (CID) for peptide sequencing, which has achieved remarkable sensitivity and efficiency now enabling single-cell analysis. However, CID shows limitations in characterizing post-translational modifications and complex proteoforms. Here we have developed an integrated mass spectrometry platform enabling automated collision-, electron- and photon-based fragmentation techniques. Using multi-enzyme deep proteomics workflows, we generated comprehensive datasets to train a unified Prosit deep learning model predicting spectra across all dissociation methods. This publicly available model, now integrated into FragPipe's MSBooster module, increased protein identifications by >10% on average for both data-dependent and data-independent acquisition across all fragmentation techniques. We demonstrate that alternative approaches, particularly electron-induced and ultraviolet photodissociation, which generate richer, more informative spectra, achieve identification efficiency competitive with CID while providing superior sequence coverage. This work establishes a framework enabling routine application of advanced fragmentation techniques in standard proteomics pipelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.