Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41872348›Full record

Observational studyInternational orthopaedics2026

Quality of life before and during the COVID-19 pandemic for people undergoing hip, knee and shoulder arthroplasty-nationwide results from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.

Stephen D Gill, Richard S Page, Qunyan Xu, Ian A Harris, David Gill, Ilana N Ackerman

Abstract readComparative StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in International orthopaedics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Stephen D GillSchool of Medicine, Deakin University, Waurn Ponds, Australia. stephen.gill2@deakin.edu.au.
Richard S PageSchool of Medicine, Deakin University, Waurn Ponds, Australia.
Qunyan XuSouth Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, Australia.
Ian A HarrisSouthwest Sydney Campuses, School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine & Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
David GillAustralian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry, Adelaide, Australia.
Ilana N AckermanSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic produced a substantial reduction in arthroplasties, which could have affected patient quality of life. This study investigated quality of life in Australians undergoing elective arthroplasty before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.

methodsUsing data from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry, quality of life was assessed in patients before and six months after primary total hip arthroplasty (THA), total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) using the EQ-5D-5L instrument. Patients with an EQ-5D Utility score less than zero were considered to have a quality of life worse than dead. Secondary outcomes included Oxford Scores, joint-specific pain, patient perceived change, responder status and patient satisfaction. Quality of life was compared before (1 July 2018-10 March 2020) and during the pandemic (11 March 2020-10 March 2023) using linear or logistic regression models.

resultsThe analysis included preoperative data for more than 24,000 THA patients, 20,000 TKA patients and 1,100 RTSA patients. Compared to the pre-pandemic period, preoperative and postoperative quality of life significantly reduced during the pandemic for THA and TKA, but not by a meaningful amount (adjusted mean difference ≤ 0.03 points, p < 0.001). The likelihood of having quality of life worse than dead increased during the pandemic but was only significant for preoperative THA (ORs 1.24 to 1.40, p < 0.02). For secondary outcomes, joint-specific scores deteriorated, and joint pain increased to a small degree during the pandemic for THA and TKA (p < 0.05), but not for RTSA. The proportion of THA and TKA patients satisfied with their surgery outcome increased modestly during the pandemic by approximately five percentage points, compared to pre-pandemic.

conclusionThe COVID-19 pandemic was not associated with a clinically meaningful deterioration in pre- or post-operative quality of life, on average, for patients undergoing THA, TKA or RTSA in Australia.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, ReplacementPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresQuality of LifeAgedAustraliaCOVID-19FemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeArthroplastyCOVID-19HipKneePandemicQuality of lifeShoulder

Identifiers

PMID41872348
PMCPMC13079467

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.