ArticleScientific reports2026
Personal trip purpose inference based on dynamic time-age functional zones.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Trip purpose is a crucial element of transportation-related data; however, it is often missing from automatically collected datasets, such as GPS records. Therefore, trip purpose must be inferred from various trip-related attributes to use transportation data effectively. This study developed a trip purpose inference model that incorporates functional zones that vary with time and age. First, these dynamic time–age functional zones were extracted from check-in data to serve as key features. Next, two inference models were constructed, one based on the extreme gradient boosting algorithm and the other on the long short-term memory network, using household and personal travel survey datasets that both included trip purpose information. The developed model was subsequently applied to a daily life movement dataset comprising open real-world data aggregated from mobile phone GPS locations without explicit trip purpose information. The results indicated a purpose-matching rate of 68% for home-to-work trips and 74% for work-to-home trips compared with the movement type information provided in the real-world dataset. These findings suggest that the proposed approach has significant potential for inferring trip purpose from large-scale transportation datasets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.