ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2026
A convolutional neural network for fully automated total metabolic tumor volume delineation in patients with aggressive Non-Hodgkin lymphoma.
Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe [18F]FDG-PET-derived total metabolic tumor volume (TMTV) has a high prognostic value in patients with Hodgkin and Non-Hodgkin lymphoma. However, in order to enable TMTV as a biomarker for clinical use, an accurate and fast method of tumor delineation in lymphoma patients is needed. Deep-learning-based methods have shown promising results in this field and offer distinct advantages over classical approaches. Therefore, the goal of this work was to train a convolutional neural network (CNN) for delineation of all lymphoma lesions regardless of their size and uptake characteristics while performing the optimal contouring of each individual lesion.
methodsA neural network was trained with the nnU-Net software package. A total of 1192 [18F]FDG-PET/CT scans from 716 patients with Non-Hodgkin lymphoma participating in the PETAL trial comprised the main dataset which was used for training. The ground truth delineation included all lesions that were clinically considered as lymphoma manifestations by an experienced observer and was developed iteratively with the assistance of intermediate CNN models. Performance of the trained network was assessed in the main dataset via 5-fold cross-validation as well as in external benchmark dataset (N = 60 scans).
resultsComparing the manual and automated delineations in the main (external) dataset, the aggregated Dice coefficient reached 0.895 (0.715) and the corresponding TMTVs were highly correlated with R2 = 0.974 (0.767). The main (external) dataset contained a total of 8971 (713) manually delineated lesions, the detection sensitivity of which was 71.2% (77.6%) with the positive predictive value of 84.1% (63.1%). Univariate Cox regression analysis in the main dataset revealed both manually and automatically derived TMTVs as highly prognostic factors for progression-free survival with very similar hazard ratios (HR = 3.5; p < 0.001 and HR = 3.7; p < 0.001, respectively).
conclusionIn this study we presented a CNN model capable of accurate TMTV delineation in [18F]FDG-PET/CT images of lymphoma patients. It is trained to delineate all tumor lesions while accounting for typical caveats inherent in this task. The developed neural network allows for substantial acceleration of quantitative analysis of lymphoma imaging data and has the potential for supervised clinical use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.