ArticleBJC reports2026
Obesity-associated gene mutations across cancer types: a pan-cancer analysis of TCGA data.
Article in BJC reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundObesity is a recognized risk factor for numerous cancers. Although several biological mechanisms have been proposed to explain obesity-associated carcinogenesis, the extent to which excess adiposity influences tumor genomic profiles remains incompletely understood. In particular, whether obesity-related selective pressures shape cancer-specific mutational landscapes is still underexplored.
methodsA pan-cancer analysis of non-synonymous somatic mutations across 14 tumor types using data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) has been conducted. Body mass index (BMI) at diagnosis was analyzed as a continuous variable. Associations between gene mutations and BMI were assessed using logistic regression models adjusted for age, sex, and tumor mutational burden, with false discovery rate correction. Genes were prioritized using a two-step ranking strategy based on mutation frequency and regression strength. Functional inactivation, exon-level mutation distribution, and Gene Ontology enrichment analyses were performed for significantly BMI-associated genes.
resultsIn particular, bladder urothelial cancer (BLCA) resulted as the most frequently mutated neoplasia in association with higher body mass index. Among Eighty-six genes significantly associated with BMI in BLCA, a prioritized set of ten genes (BRCA2, DNAH9, GRIA4, PLXNA4, UNC13C, FCGBP, SF3B1, ELP1, NES, TRERF1) has been selected for further analyses. Overweight and obese patients exhibited distinct BMI-specific exon-level mutational patterns and concurrent deleterious mutations across multiple candidate genes. Functional inactivation analysis suggested loss-of-function mechanisms in most top-ranked genes, while Gene Ontology (GO) analysis highlighted deregulation of extracellular matrix-related pathways. DISCUSSION: These findings support a role for obesity in shaping the genomic landscape of tumors, highlighting the importance of integrating clinical parameters such as BMI into genomic studies to determine the potential impact of obesity on tumor evolution, heterogeneity, and treatment response.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.