ArticleCommunications medicine2026
Deep learning using electroencephalogram (EEG) data for diagnosing and predicting SSRI response in major depressive disorder.
Article in Communications medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Explainable Temporal Deep Learning for EEG-Based Depression Detection Using Resting-State Brain Dynamics.International journal of methods in psychiatric research · 2026Article
- A brain functional network framework based on EEG connectivity for major depressive disorder recognition.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMajor Depression (MDD) is a potentially life-threatening condition that ranks among the diseases with the highest global burden. Despite its prevalence, current diagnostic methods remain largely subjective, and first-line treatments exhibit high rates of non-responders.
methodsThis study investigates the application of deep learning (DL) algorithms to electroencephalogram (EEG) data for the MDD-diagnosis and prediction of treatment outcomes following the administration of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), using six large, independent datasets with a total of n = 146 for healthy subjects and n = 203 for patients. DL models were trained on one portion of the datasets and tested on unseen data from different subjects. To interpret the classification features, Gradient-weighted Class Activation Mapping (Grad-CAM) was applied.
resultsThe models achieve an average accuracy of 67.5% (best fold 70%) in distinguishing MDD patients from healthy controls and mean 79% accuracy (best fold 85%) in predicting SSRI responders. Key EEG markers for both classification tasks revealed by Grad-CAM include alpha activity in the frontal and parietal regions. Simulation of a clinical decision scenario for SSRI treatment selection indicates a number needed to treat (NNT) of five when using a model with 80% predictive accuracy, corresponding to an increase in treatment response from a 50% baseline to 70% with model-guided selection.
conclusionThese findings underscore the clinical potential of EEG-based DL models for stratified treatment in MDD, facilitating accurate therapy choices and reducing ineffective treatments. The results of the integration of objective neurophysiological markers into clinical psychiatry are indicating the potential for more personalized treatment allocation.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.